On November 4, 2025, the digital asset market experienced a severe, widespread sell-off resulting from catastrophic failures in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, exacerbated by unprecedented levels of leverage, which, combined with global macroeconomic headwinds, led to a loss of over $400 billion in ecosystem value.
Important Information for the Reader
First of all, I would like to inform you that this post has been translated automatically, as my English is not good enough to write it myself.
Secondly, I would like to share my posts with the wider HIVE community in order to grow within this network.
For 8 years, I have been publishing 99% of my posts in Polish, but the Polish community is so small and does not support each other very well, so I decided to try my hand at translating my posts.
Time will tell what will come of it :)
1.0 Market Performance Overview: A Widespread Selloff
The digital asset market experienced a significant and widespread selloff on November 4, 2025, marking a critical inflection point where major cryptocurrencies breached key psychological and technical support levels. The event was not merely a price correction but a rapid unwinding of leverage that tested investor confidence amid a complex interplay of crypto-native failures and broader macroeconomic headwinds. The severity of the decline underscored the market's heightened sensitivity to systemic risk and established a new, more cautious tone for the remainder of the quarter.
The selloff erased substantial value across the ecosystem, with the total crypto market capitalization falling by over $400 billion in the preceding days. The table below summarizes the market's performance during the 24-hour period ending on November 4:
| Metric | Value | 24-Hour Change |
|---|---|---|
| Global Crypto Market Cap | $3.45 Trillion | ▼ 3.97% |
| Bitcoin (BTC) Price | $103,877 | ▼ 3.28% |
| BTC 24-Hour Range | $103,666 - $108,333 | |
| Ethereum (ETH) Price | $3,490.32 | ▼ 6.01% |
| Solana (SOL) Price | $159.66 | ▼ 9.08% |
| BNB Price | $949.81 | ▼ 7.31% |
| XRP Price | $2.2627 | ▼ 6.19% |
| Cardano (ADA) Price | $0.5404 | ▼ 6.60% |
| Dogecoin (DOGE) Price | $0.1650 | ▼ 5.06% |
The most notable development was Bitcoin briefly breaking below the key $100,000 psychological level during intra-day trading, shattering a support streak that had held for 180 consecutive days and signaling severe market weakness. Simultaneously, Ethereum’s sharp decline, which saw it plunge to lows near $3,275, erased all of its year-to-date gains and highlighted the intensity of the deleveraging event. While the vast majority of major assets traded lower, a few isolated outperformers, including DCR (+142%), KITE (+127%), and DASH (+66%), bucked the trend, demonstrating that pockets of speculative interest remained.
This broad market downturn was not random but was catalyzed by a series of high-impact events within the crypto ecosystem, particularly severe security and stability failures in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) sector.
Card of the Day - The Shattered Coin
Name: The Shattered Coin
Type: 🟪 Epic
Quantity: 50 pieces
Price: 10 HIVE
Available for purchase on NFTshowroom
2.0 The DeFi Contagion Event: Systemic Risk Realized
The market-wide selloff was ignited by a contagion event in the DeFi sector, where long-theorized systemic risks associated with leverage and rehypothecation were realized in a catastrophic cascade of liquidations and protocol failures. These events were not isolated exploits but rather a severe stress test that exposed deep-seated vulnerabilities that had been building beneath the surface of the recent bull market.
The Stream Finance Collapse
The crisis began to unfold on November 3, when an external fund manager for Stream Finance disclosed a catastrophic loss of approximately $93 million in fund assets. The immediate consequence was the collapse of the project's collateralized stablecoin, XUSD. The token depegged violently, crashing by over 70% to trade at approximately $0.32. In response, the Stream Finance team froze all platform withdrawals and deposits and engaged the law firm Perkins Coie LLP to investigate the incident.
Cascading Contagion and Rehypothecation
The failure of Stream Finance triggered a cascade of losses across interconnected protocols. The project's model relied on rehypothecation, where collateral posted by users is reused across multiple lending loops to maximize capital efficiency. While this boosts yields in a bull market, it creates a fragile, highly interconnected system where a single failure can spread rapidly.
An analysis by the research group 'Yields and More' (YAM) quantified the contagion, revealing that the overall debt to lenders exposed to Stream's assets was nearly $285 million. The fallout directly impacted other protocols and their stablecoins, including:
- Elixir's deUSD, which had 65% of its backing ($68 million) lent to Stream.
- Treeve's scUSD, which was exposed through rehypothecation on lending markets like Silo and Euler.
The exposure was spread across numerous major DeFi lending protocols, including Euler, Silo, Morpho, Gearbox, and Enclabs, illustrating the breadth of the systemic risk.
The Balancer Protocol Exploit
Compounding the crisis, the major DeFi protocol Balancer suffered a sophisticated exploit on November 3, with estimated losses exceeding $120 million. Attackers drained assets by exploiting a "rounding down precision loss" vulnerability within the protocol's V2 Composable Stable Pools. This vulnerability allowed for price manipulation through crafted batch swaps. Critically, this attack succeeded despite Balancer having undergone extensive audits by top security firms, highlighting the persistent risk of complex, unforeseen attack vectors in DeFi.
The combined impact of the Stream Finance collapse, the Balancer exploit, and a smaller 1 million oracle manipulation attack on Moonwell erased approximately 222 million from DeFi protocols in the first few days of November. These crypto-native failures created a crisis of confidence that was severely amplified by mounting macroeconomic pressures.
3.0 Macroeconomic and Cross-Asset Pressures
The crypto market's sharp decline was not an isolated event but was exacerbated by significant headwinds in the global financial landscape. A deteriorating "risk-off" sentiment across multiple asset classes created a challenging environment, transforming a crypto-specific deleveraging event into a market-wide rout.
The primary external factors contributing to the selloff included:
- U.S. Economic Uncertainty: The ongoing U.S. federal government shutdown, one of the longest in history, raised liquidity concerns by delaying Treasury General Account (TGA) drawdowns. This was compounded by data showing a contraction in the U.S. manufacturing sector for the eighth consecutive month.
- Cross-Asset Contagion: A notable spillover effect occurred from the underperformance of AI-related equities. Weakness in the tech sector prompted a broader flight to safety, with the Nasdaq Composite fell over 1% on the day.
- Monetary Policy Influence: Analysts also attributed the market downturn to the U.S. Treasury Auction and recent remarks from the Federal Reserve.
Despite these immediate pressures, some analysts pointed to countervailing positive macroeconomic factors, providing a more nuanced long-term view. These included recent interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve and significant progress on the U.S.-China trade deal. The Kobeissi Letter concluded that while the short-term technical picture had weakened, the long-term fundamental thesis for risk assets remained strong.
These external economic forces interacted with a rapidly evolving regulatory and geopolitical landscape.
4.0 Regulatory and Geopolitical Developments
November 4 was not only a day of market turmoil but also one that highlighted the growing and irreversible integration of digital assets into global regulatory and geopolitical frameworks. Increasing scrutiny from governments is creating both compliance challenges and pathways to mainstream legitimacy.
U.S. Treasury Sanctions North Korean Crypto Operations
On November 4, the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took direct action against illicit crypto activity by listing 53 cryptocurrency addresses linked to the sanctioned North Korean bank, Cheil Credit Bank. The action was taken to disrupt the facilitation of North Korean cybercrime, which U.S. authorities state is used to fund the country's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile programs. According to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic, North Korea-affiliated actors have stolen more than $2 billion in digital assets in 2025 alone.
The Broader Shift Toward Comprehensive Oversight
This targeted action occurs within a global trend toward comprehensive regulatory oversight. Landmark legislative frameworks are establishing clear rules for the industry. Key examples include:
- The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which mandates licensing and capital requirements for crypto service providers.
- The United States' Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), which imposes strict 1:1 backing and disclosure rules for stablecoin issuers.
Tether's Systemic Scale in a Regulated World
The scale of the centralized stablecoin market demonstrates the deep integration of digital assets into global finance. Tether's Q3 2025 attestation report highlighted its massive financial footprint. The report noted:
- A record ~$135 billion exposure to U.S. Treasuries, making Tether the 17th-largest holder of U.S. government debt globally.
- A year-to-date net profit exceeding $10 billion.
This scale positions Tether as a systemically important player in traditional financial markets, underscoring why regulators are prioritizing stablecoin oversight.
5.0 Market Internals and Sentiment Analysis
The velocity of the November 4 crash was dictated by the market's own internal structure, where an architecture of unprecedented leverage transformed a selloff into a full-blown liquidation cascade.
The Role of Excessive Leverage
Analysts identified leverage as being at "unprecedented levels," acting as a key amplifier of market moves. This was evidenced by the staggering average of 300,000 traders being liquidated per day in the period leading up to the crash.
On November 4 alone, over 1.1 billion in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated within 24 hours. The pain was particularly acute for Ethereum traders, where 287 million in long positions were erased in a single hour, highlighting the speed and severity of the deleveraging.
Plunge into "Extreme Fear"
The massive liquidations decimated market sentiment. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index plummeted to a reading of 21, a level signifying "Extreme Fear." This marked the lowest and most depressed sentiment reading since early April.
A Dichotomy Between Retail and Institutional Behavior
Amid the panic, on-chain data revealed a stark divergence between retail and institutional (or "whale") activity.
- Retail Capitulation: The extreme fear reading reflected widespread panic among retail investors.
- Calculated Whale Moves: In contrast, large holders made strategic moves. One prominent whale closed a profitable short position of 66,000 ETH, locking in over $24 million. Another whale withdrew 110,000 ETH (worth $386 million) from an exchange, suggesting an intent to hold.
Retail investors continued to accumulate ETH during the dip, indicating a resilient, if battered, belief in the asset's long-term value, even as institutions registered outflows.
6.0 Strategic Outlook and Risk Assessment
The events of November 4, 2025, serve as a powerful case study in the interplay between on-chain mechanics, macroeconomic pressures, and regulatory developments. The market is at a crossroads, balancing significant near-term risks against compelling long-term catalysts.
| Bearish Indicators | Potential Bullish Catalysts |
|---|---|
| Technical Breakdown: Major assets like BTC broke critical psychological and technical support levels (e.g., $100,000). | Strong Long-Term Fundamentals: High levels of adoption and advancing technology persist, underpinning network value. |
| Massive Deleveraging: Over $1.1 billion in liquidations in a single day signals extreme fragility from excessive leverage. | Expected Monetary Easing: Recent Federal Reserve rate cuts and the potential for further easing could support risk assets. |
| Extreme Fear Sentiment: The Fear & Greed Index at 21 indicates widespread retail capitulation and potential for further panic-selling. | Growing Institutional Participation: Continued inflows into products like the new Bitcoin and Solana ETFs (the latter attracting over $400M) provide a structural source of demand. |
| DeFi Systemic Risks: The Stream Finance and Balancer incidents exposed deep contagion risks. | Increasing Regulatory Clarity: Landmark frameworks like MiCA and the GENIUS Act are expected to bring long-term stability and unlock institutional capital. |
Institutional perspective remains cautiously optimistic, viewing the retail panic as a potential contrarian signal. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan suggested that market stabilization could occur sooner than expected as institutions see a buying opportunity. However, technical analysts remain wary; Ali Martinez presented a bearish scenario where Ethereum could fall to $1,700 by mid-2026, while Markus Thielen identified $2,700–$2,800 as the next likely support zone.
Key takeaways for financial professionals include:
- Leverage as a Systemic Amplifier: The primary driver of recent volatility is unprecedented leverage within the crypto derivatives market.
- DeFi's Immaturity: Recent exploits expose significant contagion risks; rigorous due diligence on protocol security is non-negotiable.
- Regulatory Trajectory is Set: Regulation is an irreversible trend, which will impose near-term compliance burdens but is the key catalyst for long-term institutional legitimacy.
- Divergence in Sentiment is Key: Monitoring whale movements and exchange flows can provide valuable signals about potential market bottoms.
The November 4 crash marks a transition away from a period of speculative excess and toward a future where digital assets are a more integrated, albeit still volatile, component of the global financial system.
FAQ
What primarily caused the significant selloff in the digital asset market on November 4, 2025?
The significant selloff was catalyzed by a series of high-impact events within the crypto ecosystem, specifically a major contagion event in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) sector involving severe security and stability failures. This DeFi crisis, coupled with the rapid unwinding of unprecedented leverage and challenging global macroeconomic conditions (like the U.S. government shutdown), amplified the downturn.
How did the Stream Finance collapse contribute to the market crisis?
The crisis began with Stream Finance disclosing a catastrophic loss of approximately $93 million, which caused its collateralized stablecoin, XUSD, to violently depeg, crashing by over 70%. Critically, Stream Finance's model relied on rehypothecation, which allowed the failure to trigger cascading losses across interconnected protocols, exposing numerous lenders to nearly $285 million in debt.
What role did leverage play in the speed and severity of the market decline?
Leverage was identified as a key systemic amplifier, operating at "unprecedented levels" prior to the crash. When downward momentum started, this excessive leverage triggered a domino effect of forced selling, resulting in the liquidation of over $1.1 billion in leveraged crypto positions within 24 hours on November 4. This forced deleveraging accounted for the extreme speed and severity of the price drops, particularly for Ethereum traders, who saw $287 million in long positions erased in a single hour.
What major regulatory developments are shaping the digital asset market?
The digital asset market is being fundamentally reshaped by global regulatory frameworks, including the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which mandates licensing, and the U.S.'s Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), which imposes strict 1:1 backing rules for stablecoins. Additionally, targeted enforcement actions, such as the U.S. Treasury's OFAC sanctioning 53 crypto addresses linked to North Korean cybercrime, demonstrate increasing geopolitical oversight.
Disclaimer
This content is intended to enrich readers' knowledge and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, legal, or any other form of advice intended for specific use. Trading cryptocurrencies involves high risk and volatility. The historical performance of an asset does not determine its expected future performance. Always do your own research and use cash that you can afford to lose before investing. Any actions related to the purchase and sale of Bitcoin and other investments in cryptocurrency assets are the responsibility of the reader.