The Problem:
Bitcoin takes too long and costs too much to process transactions. The time it takes to process a transaction is a result of the current block size, if you want your transaction to process faster, you’ll need to pay higher transaction fees. Unfortunately this has led to both slower transaction times as well as higher transaction fees.
The debate:
Segwit- Adjusts how much information is recorded in each block, this can be implemented as a soft fork, can be done quickly and will not split the blockchain. It is not a permanent solution, but some will argue that a permanent solution is not necessary at this time, rather we just need to improve transaction times.
If segwit is implemented, this opens the door for an additional improvement to the bitcoin protocol in the form of what is called the Lightning Network.
Bitcoin Unlimited- Increases the actual size of the blocks, thus allowing for more transactions to be recorded in each block. Since any increase of block size over 1megabyte would change the rules of Bitcoin, this would result in a hard fork. This would take much longer to implement and runs the very real risk of splitting bitcoin into two different coins, which will very likely result in a decrease of the price of each coin for quite some time before they can recover. When Ethereum hard forked, it took about one year for the price of ether to recover.
What are the ramifications if there is a hard fork of the bitcoin blockchain?
There are many variables in this problem
First, will the online exchanges, hardware wallets and third party wallets support BTC, BTU, or both? Will your BTC remain BTC? Will it be converted into BTU? Will you receive an equal amount of BTU for your holdings of BTC?
I should note that BTC stands for bitcoin core, which is the name of the long standing development team behind bitcoin. and BTU stands for Bitcoin Unlimited, the development team with Roger Ver at the head.
In order for you to make in informed decision as to what is the best way to prepare for this possible hard fork, I strongly suggest you investigate the stance of the company behind where you store your bitcoins. For example, if you keep your bitcoins on an exchange, your bitcoins will be subject to whichever side they choose to support. If you store your bitcoins on a hardware wallet, you will also be subjected to whichever side they choose to support.
The Trezor and Ledger and KeepKey hardware wallets have all announced that they will support both BTC and BTU if Bitcoin Unlimited is implemented.
If you store your bitcoins on a local wallet where you control your private keys then you will receive an equal amount of BTU for your holdings of BTC. Which is exactly what happened when Ethereum hard forked and resulted in the creation of ether classic.
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pehuxl4OgLYYou forgot to mention that Bitcoin is community driven while Bitcoin unlimited is backed by big miners aka companies that specialize in mining. These are centralized entities and in my opinion that is not what bitcoin is about. Bitcoin should stay as decentralized as possible! If a hardfork happens i will stay with the more decentralized coin and the companies can keep their Bitcoin unlimited.
Congratulations @wojt4s! You have received a personal award!
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard!
Participate in the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @good-karma and @lukestokes
Congratulations @wojt4s! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!