A few comments:
2 Reverse Dilution.
Please let's not talk about dilution in the case of BTS. There is no dilution in Bitshares, period. Supply is fixed, and it can only decrease if tokens are destroyed.
The reserve pool is one of the greatest innovations of Bitshares. Instead of downplaying its meaning and talking like BTS is like any other coin that's supply is handled with a formula, we should emphasize that Bitshares is a unique system. The amount of liquid BTS can grow, but that's not the same thing as dilution.
3 Implement Suspended Features.
Maybe they were suspended for a reason? Instead of trying to get back to the road that has already failed, maybe better solution would be to do some serious market research and find out what people actually want and need. Is there a pain that Bitshares can relieve? The priorization of development should be based on what markets want – not what was planned a long time ago.
4 Add Spit and Polish.
Bitshares is still trying to get early adopters. They are usually very forgiving when it comes to UI, bugs and stuff like that.
Premium user experience is important for the majority. But before the majority is reached, early adopters need to get taken care of. And often it's enough for them if you just tell that UX improvements are coming in the near future. There is no acute need to use lots of resources for it.
When Bitshares has so much early adopters that crossing the chasm starts to get really close, UX becomes truly important. But there is still a long time for that.
It's very common mistake to polish UX for a product or feature, thinking that "once the UX is perfect, markets will love us!". But it's highly possible that markets just don't want the product. In that case it doesn't matter how great the UX is, nobody will buy it.
7 Reach out to the Industry.
Yes, this is really important. Talk to potential customers, investors and developers and find out what they need and want.
Let's not forget that Bitshares is a platform. For a platform there is at least two totally different market segments: developers / service providers and end-users. Mastering platform economics is hard because chicken-and-egg problem is very common. Service providers are not interested because there are no users. Users are not interested because there is no services or applications that they need and want.
All good points. Best way to master platform economics is to experiment.
My main point is that the argument that we need to hunker down and do nothing until the market cap improves is now more foolish than ever. There are many things that could be done and we should be discussing them.