I'm not evaluating the content, I'm evaluating his right to speak it and the conspiracy to destroy a competitor's business. It's actually better if the example is controversial. One's right to speak is not a function of the content of that speech.
That said, each individual company has the right to choose who it serves, just like I have the right not to bake you a wedding cake. Oh, wait...
He's free to speak it. But the platforms are private and they lay out quite clearly the rules of speaking on their platform. Rules were broken and he was kicked out. I don't see the problem? As you say, each individual company has the right.
Do you not think if Alex Jones had not repeatedly broken the rules of these platforms he would still be on there now?
All he has to do is find a platform that'll allow his vile views, or create his own. Quite how so many people in America take this guy seriously is beyond me.
He's kicking off because he's lost over half his traffic that's all.
Too bad.