The issue here is it's not "someplace else", it's the same chain, I can look it up right now on peakd. Another is that 3 of his identical posts had the same voter on it. Even if one were to use the excuse that "well it didn't get much rewards the first time/price was low back then, etc" that's still not how hive posts and curation works. It's meant to be a 1 shot at it for a specific piece of content to accept rewards on it, to gain a following, autovoters, etc, not to keep reposting the same content over and over and start recycling it after x time has passed. If it's not about the rewards then repost it with declined rewards or it going to the DHF or Null. Hive stake is different from other revenue generation, we're not taking ad money from a company to give to authors, frankly I'm surprised no hive front-end has ad revenue generation to share with whoever gets the most attention to begin with for evergreen content or to repost things on purpose for that with declined post rewards. Hive stake you may have earned 4 years ago would have grown by a lot more by now and that's one of the beauties of it and why it should be limited to be earned once per a specific content.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: