You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Taking a look at a token project's voting pattern

in #bleh6 months ago

I'm pretty sure one of the parts of the equation for KE has to do with how much of your stake you have delegated out. That's why I brought it up. So you are saying self voting would be okay? There are a lot of people who would argue with you on that. They would also effectively zero out accounts for doing it. I've always understood where you are coming from, I just think the barriers for people to be successful here are to vague and too unreasonable. Why can't we focus on fixing that?

Sort:  

If you mouse-over KE on peakd it explains that it's just a simple number that adds your author and curation rewards together and divides it based on your current stake. Delegations actually muddy the KE as you now have another account earning curation rewards in your favor and giving you liquid Hive instead which you can power up to "fake" a good KE rating.

image.png

I guess it was something else I saw that took into account HIVE delegated out. Maybe it was a bot that someone created. I could have swore it was part of that equation though.