I don't know exactly how long I've been in the ecosystem, but I think I've been around long enough to realize many things that I personally find discouraging.
I have learned that as a user it is my responsibility to give value to the work that I do and that deserves to have an optimal activity with foundation and respect. It is from here that the good reader and the good author start, but unfortunately (I return and emphasize this personally), I feel that somehow there are limitations when you want to vary the content and despite making the effort to maintain an activity in a certain constant way this is very difficult to be valued if there is not something in between and I think it is too much to say it.
How different it would be if everything was rewarded by giving real value to the constancy of making community in an optimal and natural way without depending on a delegation.
Not really sure what you're asking there in the end, kind of confusing grammar/translation possibly.
I mean that it is somewhat tedious to vary the content in different communities, that despite implementing a constant activity in terms of making community, i.e., visiting content, reading it and leaving a good comment. If there is no delegation in between, it is very difficult for them to value your own content that you share there.
It would be really good that the value that is given to our content is also reflected in the constant activity that I mentioned before about reading and leaving a good comment. That not everything should depend on making a delegation to be able to give value to our content.
Hopefully now if you understand or at least understand my point of view.
yeah that's kind of exactly the issue I have with these projects, they neglect regular users who still put in effort because they're not getting something in return.
That tends to be quite frustrating, hopefully at some point they will change that and give a little more priority to the community building effort.