You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: BLOODY IMPORTANT QUESTION: should we consider STEEM-ENGINE tokens a security or utility?

in #blockchain5 years ago

You heard about Howey test used in the USA?
"a person invests his money in a common enterprise and is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party,"
1946 Supreme Court case: SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., FL.
I don't know enough about LEO. The little I know about PAL leads me to believe it might not match the Howey test.

  1. Tokens may be bought - but much of the original issue was not. (unclear, maybe yes)
  2. The Enterprise is common (imo no, you post for yourself, curate for yourself)
  3. Profit solely from the efforts of others (no, you post for yourself, curate for yourself)

Additionally, you can argue PAL's a utility token; Can be spent for upvotes (utility) or staked to improve curation earnings. One wrinkle is that inflation granted to stakers might represent a profit from the effort of others.
No doubt PAL is an asset of a kind, and PAL earned (e.g. curation) is income of a sort.
Depending on where on lives, this is probably taxable. Doesn't make it a security though.

Posted using Partiko Android

Sort:  

I've never heard about that case @eturnerx. Thx for pointing me in that direction.