You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The History of Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPOS)

in #blockchain6 years ago (edited)

I agree, this is why I wanted to raise the issue because these statements are, first off, illogical and second, they are contradictory.

While I cannot speak for Cz intentions in these statements, I feel they certainly imply that Binance has a desire to retain rights to influence/participate in voting/governance - as you correctly point out - as they see fit.

This statement refers to elevating the interests of the exchange over the interests of the Steem token holders and the community as a whole.