There are many people here who simply aren't aware of Blurt's existence. There are also new users who aren't aware that there are better alternatives :P Just two years ago, users came to us who thought Blurt was just another interface hive. So they won't have any doubts anymore. Besides, yesterday, two new users and one who received an airdrop commented on my post, so what can I say? :P
I'm incredibly curious what kind of account you had, and especially what views someone refused to accept, and how many tokens you earned from it. XD There have been a few who have ridden Blurt like a wild pig. It was funny how users were eager to upvote them because we all appreciate a different opinion. Eventually, they got tired of it and left, but of course, with a pocket full of tokens. And that's good :P
I don't know where the idea that Blurt is tolerant comes from? Of course not. It's not about tolerance, it's about decentralizing ideological groups. That's true freedom of speech. Well, here on Hive, it happened as the mathematical perspective suggests, presented here:
https://peakd.com/hive/@khrom/why-downvotes-contradict-decentralization-a-mathematical-perspective
One ideological group gained a significant advantage because downvotes quickly led to the other being displaced. Some of the latter are now on Blurt, while others have abandoned all DPOS altogether. And now you're all stewed in your own juices and patting yourselves on the back. The problem is, you're mostly leftists here.
No one will pat you on the back on Blurt. You have to make an effort to think there if you want to participate in the discussion. That's probably where your unpleasant impressions come from ;)