Ok - great. Updated that in my long term table.
But that is interesting. That means I got you wrong on the short term. I though you primary count is bullish - going up from 6'000. But that wouldn't fit you saying that the highest probability is that we go lower.
It would help me if the primary count is always reflected somehow (could be not update or just referred to in one sentence). Just an idea which might help also other followers of your great TA.
Ok, I get that. I try to be more clear from now on.
The biggest problem is that in a prolonged correction like this, the probabilites change whenever another bullcount is invalidated.
In this case I was indeed short term bullish because I thought that the ABC could not be complete, but it turned out that it was already complete -.-
So even if we would have touched 7k again, my primary count would have suggested another low.