Some good points, but using absolutes like all and every while speculating on coverage and intent, dilutes your credibility. Every person needs to be judged individually on their own actions, grouping everyone together will not solve anything.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dead on.
The use of 'they', 'establishment', 'agenda' and other similar general words us a real telltale...
Which lies should we not believe? Those that we are supposed to hear in the general medias or those that we read in posts like this?
Who is speaking on behalf of all users of this Blockchain?
Since when would it be a good thing to finance support of a separatist group through a new ICO?
Nice words but it's pure propaganda.
And clearly it works time and time again judging by the rewards this type of posts make.
Posted using Partiko Android
I was thinking the same thing. When you make blanket condemnation of various entities in society you damage your own message. I have known some honest journalists, lawyers, politicians, etc. I recently worked on the Beto O'Rourke campaign for that very reason. You could dismiss him under the accusation that "they are all the same," but you would be wrong. He is different than most. Of course he lost for refusing to cater his message to each special interest group. Oh well, back to the drawing board.