US Space Research Organization 'NASA', including scientists from the world's powerful countries, have said that the neighboring red planet was dead. After sending the Curiosity Rover to know about the planet, NASA scientists know that after one wondrous information.
image source
Despite the fact that the people were not killed in the mangalagata, the water was found. Now it is necessary to see if there can be a living environment to build a living environment! '
NASA has begun to work with that goal! The competition is not behind other powerful nations in the world. Even Saudi Arabia has poured money for Mars operations.
Although the luminous scientists of Nuclear States like NASA have the potential to live in Mars, they never said that there was also a living creature. Even last month, a few pictures of Curiosity Rovers were silent about NASA. But due to the mass media and alien trustees, some of these pictures are leaked.
The picture shows that the mysterious fossils of multiple organisms are buried on Mars. Which proves that at one time the red planet was the life-time fair. Maybe or still the planet is not dead.
One group of scientists says that the fossils found in the film are not too big. "The existence of fossil fossils is understood to be the first to appear in the film," Barry DeGreei, a researcher at Buckingham Center for Astrobiology at the University of Buckingham, told the British newspaper Daily Star. Besides, there is evidence of the life on this planet. '
His idea of the picture, soft fossils of fossils but less than 7 billion years ago. Barry says that after receiving such convincing evidence, NASA should now bring the matter publicly. Accepting that 'there are no planets in the world, there are many planets in life!'
NASA also does not deny what is seen in the leaked picture. But their demand is that they are fossils, but they are not! The company claims that the shape of the glass on Mars looks fossilized. But it is not right to say nothing before the test!
one day we'll now the truth, or we might not