Sort:  

Similar in context, different in style.. Tim's more of a journalist in the vein of a boots-on-the-ground war correspondent.. in this case, the culture war. Stefan is more long form discussion of the philosophical underpinnings of various topics/issues.. Tim does some of that, but he shines in the midst of street protest chaos.

He's reported on the ground in Baltimore, Ferguson, Sweden & Fukushima to name a few.. will talk to anyone that has information to impart, regardless of 'side'.. His politics are hard to interpret (as should be w/ any good journalist) and strives to cover all sides so the viewer can make their own conclusions.

Cernovich I see as covering a middle ground between Tim & Stefan.. he has a bit of both styles, with the focus on media critique.. which he does extremely well.

Great review: Tim is more focused on the interview / journalism style while Molyneux is more philosophy focused. Cernovich might be more in the middle of those style, those things. Where would you place Alex Jones in all of this?

Alex is the PT Barnum of the age.. he's the ratings juggernaut so I view him as the hub, and his guests spoke out in all directions.. and he's funny as hell.

Yeah, I love the gay frogs. Love the Somalis song. Speaking of hub, now, do you think Steemit is becoming a better hub than Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, etc? I like that Steemit has Dtube, Dsound, Dlive, those 3, and maybe more too. Do they have D-art or D-GIF yet? Better yet, D-news would be great.

I want D-time to be a network focused on writing history and it can have a timeline and it may have alternative time lines maybe. I love history and I would love for D-wikipedia places online. I like Dtube, Dlive, Dsound, and really want to see more. And maybe D-science as well. And D-comics.

The history idea is great, but not just as an idea, or a copy of Wikipedia. What we need is someones to gather and preserve all the history books which the left are busy trashing.

You cannot preserve your culture, your religion and traditions, if all books the left don't like are trashed.

Same idea would also be good with regard to science, since the science books are also being changed to fit the left narrative.

Agreed, books must be saved. Some books are revised in order to merge more with progressive narratives. That is why we have to go back to the oldest versions of certain books for example. For the past century, books have been merging towards the left, slowly, and some people do not even realize we are frogs being cooked in hot water. It has been changing like you said, in regards to science, history, and many things. I second your challenge, your advice.

It would be good to deal with this in a two-pronged manner.

  1. Find older books and photocopy to pdf or rtf
  2. Find older copies and use food preserving vacuum bag machines for preserving them. If it was crowdfunded, we could get machines that also pump in an inert gas, while getting plastic bags that can last at least 50 years and be tinted to prevent light destroying the books. We could also use airtight cases for burying the books all over the countries (andin many countries). I would include simple books that explain how things work and the basics of science, agriculture and so on, to assist the survivors should we destroy ourselves (not just by nuclear bombs, with migrants determined to take over the countries they are living in, we could very well see such a collapse). These books could be the shortcut to a return of knowledge and technology.

My first thought was, it is a bit difficult for me to do from South Africa...but I think it is a bit of a cop-out. We need people to be doing this all over the world, preserving books in all languages.

BTW -there is a free program (http://freewarehome.com) that allows you to post files on Tor as Torrents, so that nobody can kill your files or censor them, as they are spread out over thousands of computers. This might be one useful way to handle it (not as a sole method, we must remain inventive)

As you suggested, this must be a team effort...and not just by elderly people, though I do not say that as a condition; more elderly persons are likely to care.

If this could be crowdfunded so that small non-profit companies can be formed for employing people to do this every day, we could very soon have tens of thousands of books. By the way, I would also like to see the classic novels included, as they are also being destroyed, for ridiculous reasons the university students of today come up with.

Do you know anyone who has experience of securing funds from crowdfunding sources?

Also, we must find a way to contact conservative students at universities who could try to help us save the older books in the university libraries.