You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Reporte de curación de Chess Brothers para el día 01/09/2026

I brought this up on the Hivewatchers Discord—I don't think I'm mistaken—but either way, you're here now. I'd like to put this issue behind us...

Do you commit to waiting at least 24 hours between curation reports? If so, we will remove the downvotes.

Sort:  

Greetings. As can be seen in our Hive history and on my personal blog, I also represent the Chess Brothers project. @Eniolw is not the sole owner of the project or the account; it is a shared responsibility that we have solidly maintained over time.

Regarding Hive Watchers, I am not entirely sure what you are referring to. That project is not currently operational, and if you are referring to a past issue, they took only a few minutes to process our appeal, as what they raised had absolutely nothing to do with what you mentioned.

As for your demand, what is the reason or justification behind it? This social network was not built for what you are demanding. We have provided clear arguments and explanations, but your unwillingness to address them or reflect on the matter naturally makes us question your true motivations.

Whether consciously or unconsciously, you are infringing upon our right to use our blog, in which we have invested stake on this blockchain. We have not broken any terms of service or engaged in standard bad practices for which downvotes are typically reserved, as @stayoutoftherz already explained to you.

If you are acting in good faith, you should reflect on why you feel entitled to impose a standard that does NOT exist on this blockchain/social network, and whether this approach truly contributes to the growth of the community. I hope you will put an end to these hostilities.

Why is it so hard to post just one report a day, like other projects do?

I am acting in good faith. I want to put this drama behind us, but for some reason, you don't want to compromise at all.

Another option is for you to create original content instead of repeating a template. That way, I'd have no problem with you posting multiple times a day. That is the fundamental principle this network was built on: "Proof of Brain".

Let’s see… why is this so difficult? Because you keep dodging what @eniolw and I already explained. That’s not a real debate; you sound like a prosecutor dismissing solid evidence just to say, "They’re guilty because I say so."

Furthermore, If this were in good faith, you would have talked to us instead of defaulting to months of downvotes and accusations. Where is the benefit of the doubt? You ignore other accounts that post multiple times a day, yet you target us—even though we normally publish just once daily.

Besides, your core idea is actually good and we’ll take it into account, though it's a pity you didn't present it sooner. Our curation reports are a five-year blog tradition, and we won't drop them on a whim. Substance matters more than formalities, and "one post a day" isn't even an official platform rule.

Life in our country changes constantly, as you well know. We aim for one daily report, but if there's a delay, we still maintain an average of seven posts a week—meaning there is no abuse. Why police this so strictly while ignoring powerful users doing the exact same thing?

We cannot commit to your rigid demands because circumstances change overnight, and we won’t give up our right to use our blog legitimately. That aside, thanks for the suggestion; we'll consider it alongside our ongoing original content, like our conversation club reports and shorts.

Where is the doubt? You ignore other accounts that post multiple times a day.

You are the only ones posting repeated templates (copy-paste) multiple times a day, along with another one out there that I also downvote. I haven't seen those accounts you're referring to. As for the other ones I've seen posting several times a day, it isn't duplicate content.

Our content curation reports have been a blog tradition for five years, and we won't remove them without reason.

I know that—I've been seeing your posts for years—but while doing curation this year, I came across 3 posts on the same day, and that alarmed me.

Daily curation reports that lack original content are spam—most of the ones on Hive are—but they have been normalized, and I'm not going to swim against the stream, even if this practice is unethical. However, accepting more than one a day with such high rewards is just excessive farming. Disagreement over rewards has always existed on Hive, and that is precisely what we are applying here.

thank you for the suggestion; we will keep it in mind along with our usual original content

I can hold you to this then. I hope to see original content and not copy-paste. You could explain why you voted for each post, what you found interesting about it, so creators can learn creation criteria and improve their posts. That would actually bring real value to the community.