I provided an argument, in no gentlemanly way did you respond. You spoke aggressively, and insultingly and you dare to say that I "play the victim"? No, I am no victim, I am a victor.
Nothing you ever said in reply to me was an argument on the basis of logical economic theory or anything of the sort. You are an intelligent and capable person in your own way, but in no way are you an economist. You do not understand the ideas you suggest.
Even though you wish to insult me, and you did bring that part out of me, I will try to maintain a cooler head. You're misguided, but you are sincere.
Remember that you commented on my statements, not the other way around. And when I replied you chose to act in a very despicable way. You pretend that your comment "sorry, I am not going to read that" is in some way not entirely an intentionally disrespectful method of jabbing me. Only the completely idiotic will believe you.
If you had any intelligible argument you would have made it in response to my reply to you. You did not, because you do not.
I'm two sentences in and I've already decided I'm not going to read your bullshit. Deal with it.
See, more evidence. I make an argument for a particular outlook, not even directed at you, and you go ranting on my comment trying to get at me emotionally and then claim you refuse to read my responses.
Its not my problem that you can't understand basic economics. And just so you know, it is fine if you do not read what I have to say, because other people might stumble upon it and they can see my arguments and how you have responded.
Yes. They can see how I've decided to NOT respond to your constant barrage of passive aggressive and disrespectful ramblings.
I don't live in a world where I need to be concerned about what some random person thinks of me because I don't feel like listening or talking to you.
There's no winners and losers in a conversation.
That screenshot shows how you like to act before you decide you need to be concerned about your image. People can go ahead and see all of your passive aggressive stabs and direct insults. And deleting it doesn't make it go away.
I've already pointed out how there's two years of evidence proving your "basic economics" doesn't work. If your "basic economics" was such a great idea, where's your money?
As I said, you're parroting a sales pitch.
What you don't realize is the moment that bidbot as promotion idea becomes as successful as it possibly can is also the exact moment the business models collapses and becomes useless.
It can't scale. There are only 20-50 valuable slots to purchase. If thousands of people were vying for those positions, each one would only be able to purchase a few seconds of promotional time to be in the spot light. If everyone purchased votes, whatever the going rate to reach a certain rung of the ladder was, let's say $50. If everyone purchased $50, that $50 becomes the new zero or starting point and the only ones making money are those selling votes. If the content producers can't make money, there's no content. Without content there's no one to sell votes to, with the exception of a few amatuers without talent, but those people don't bring eyes to the platform, meaning the value declines and the public loses interest. If you're showing off a platform that pays, but $50 is the breaking even point, the market will reflect the value of $50 as $0. If only a small group of vote sellers are making money, that puts tremendous selling pressure on the token. Proof is all around you.
Since you think there's a mass of people reading this, if any of you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Blake. I'm done speaking to you. If the last word is what you require to feel like a "winner" in your imaginary debate held in front of thousands of people, go ahead. If you send me another hissy fit though and then decide to delete, like you've been doing here the entire time, to make your fake image look better than your reality, I'll be more than happy to show the folks the kind of games you're playing in this conversation.