I have to say this is practically impenetrable language. It reminds me of Alfred North Whitehead, and likely because it deals with the same subject matter, which language very poorly enables discussing. For example, consciousness so poorly describes what we are, the egos managing the collective of conscious entities we run (our bodies), that being asleep or sedated is referred to as 'unconscious', while it has been shown our conscious is hard at work in those states, but is merely non-responsive physically.
Thanks!