Guys, all of you are welcome to provide a reasonable alternative to KYC for ensuring no one abuses the reward. I am sure every project will be happy to implement a reasonable alternative.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Guys, all of you are welcome to provide a reasonable alternative to KYC for ensuring no one abuses the reward. I am sure every project will be happy to implement a reasonable alternative.
Hi @hatu,
Could It be possible to link Steemit account (wallet) like we do in other dapps?.
Maybe It would be possible to add a phone number as other social networks use as a spam wall.
I personally have no problem identifying myself on a serious site. I've done It so many times...I can't understand why people get scared so easily about this when they are all monitored on their normal lives. All of us pay an ISP to go out over here and there...all have bank cards, Cars, insurances, we all pay with our cards while phonning...shoul I continue ? I Guess is enough.
Would be great if we could do It whitout a KYC process but I don't think it's a big problem. Other stuff is if it's worth. All seems so ideal and profitable...
Thanks so much for sharing this new, I came here thanks to Piotr and I'm glad I did.
Best wishes
The problem is that those hesitant to do a KYC would be equally hesitant to pass an OTP through their phone number.
But we all have already passed them so many times at so many sites like Facebook, Google( the whole service has even our payment credentials), Microsoft and a long etc.
I wonder how many steemians have already passed exchangers KYC’s in order to get some FIAT.
I understand that all must be careful but not paranoid.
Anyway a “must read” work and investigation should we all start with previous to any movement in such way.
Cheers
It's closer than you think. KYC is badly interpreted by many companies... and I get that... even experienced. But it will be something necessary! We just need to educate governments on how to do it right!
You make a point but sites like FB do not offer money for signing up. So, people have nothing to abuse.
Not true sorry... I can abuse if even not offered money for. One thing is not the opposite of the other... unfortunately that's the reality.
I think it's futile to try to ensure no one abuses. I doubt KYC even does.
At least it makes it very difficult.
It seems like it'd be pretty much the same keystrokes to abuse whether there's KYC or not.
It does make it easier for the KYC gatherers to harass people in the world outside the platform though, and curtail account spam type stuff iff you can only have one account.
I agree that one on one... it will be useless... but the idea behind the enterprise world is much more than simple user understanding.
It will hit pretty fast the economy. Just need that AI to become standard software the usual JavaScript user does... and it will be as easy as butter. If you know how KornShell influenced other shells.. then you know where I am getting!