Yeah I get it now. Your approach is just unnecessarily complicated.
It's kinda weird, but I made some mistake in thinking that different number pairs would lead to different solutions. Ofcourse they are both divided by 7 eventually, which I missed at 49 and therefore thought the same would be true at 63.
Yes correct!
Would you mind explaining why that's the answer?
Changing the incorrect number 49 for 63 then...
63 x 1/9 x W + 82 x 1/12 x (552 - W))
so you can simplify the 63 with the 9 and the 82 with the 12
7 x W + 7 x (552 - W)
Actually at the end you have just to multiply 7x552 and you get the number
Yeah I get it now. Your approach is just unnecessarily complicated.
It's kinda weird, but I made some mistake in thinking that different number pairs would lead to different solutions. Ofcourse they are both divided by 7 eventually, which I missed at 49 and therefore thought the same would be true at 63.
then the riddle is unsolvable