Crypto projects need to work together. Yes, even ones who are in direct competition with each other for the same use cases and users.
This space has long been dominated by tribalism. After the era of Bitcoin dominance ended and the original chain was no longer supposed to do everything, every blockchain under the sun scrambled for market share. But it wasn't just market share they were vying for: they were vying for a shot at the throne, of being the one chain to rule them all.
That hasn't worked out well for any of them. Ethereum came the closest, but failed to properly encapsulate the majority of use cases in crypto. Now, we have many chains, particularly legacy ones, fighting for relevance and survival, their remaining communities still convinced that their project will be the one that wins, while all others will lose. This hasn't worked out very well.
And yes, it has always made sense for chains with different use cases to work together, because network effects can be compounded without stealing users and market share from each other. But now, it makes sense for even direct competitors to co-promote. Here's why.
Storming the beach analogy
Imagine a group of soldiers storming a beach under heavy gunfire.
Each one needs to break through the enemy fortifications in order to survive. They each have a limited amount of ammunition with which to accomplish their mission, and can only recover some off of fallen comrades.
Defeating the enemy in this analogy is achieving mass adoption. The soldiers are individual blockchains (or blockchain projects/companies), and ammunition can be considered as users or market share.
Rather than attempting to break through alone, they should join forces and fight as a unit, taking risk and effort to help each other to succeed and survive.
Wait, shouldn't we be fighting each other?!
Wouldn't it make sense for the projects to be directly competing with each other, even harming each other to get ahead?
No, definitely not at this point. Here's why.
In the storming the beach analogy, sure, a soldier could attempt to take out the competition, and if they're lucky even take their ammunition. But this makes enemies out of the rest, amplifying the threats on their life. It also makes breaking through the enemy fortifications significantly more difficult for a lone soldier than with a group. Picking off single combatants one-by-one is much lighter work than taking on a group working together.
Similarly, if a crypto project hurts others and competes with them aggressively, yes, there may be a chance that in doing so they manage to steal away some of their users (ammo). But not only do they still face a much more difficult path to victory than by joining forces, but they lose the opportunity to learn from other projects and potentially share users much closer, so that if one falls, its users and market share have an easy second-best option to shift to, rather than dissipating and leaving crypto entirely. And, if toxic enough, a crypto may make actual enemies, and have to face them as well as the central banking system they're currently fighting.
Some crypto projects are already busy alienating their contemporaries, and as such we're seeing them left out of beneficial collaborations.
Is everyone going to make it?
Quite simply, no.
Most crypto projects won't make it long-term, and will either continue a slow slide to irrelevance, or will completely collapse outright. There is no avoiding this: in the free market as in nature, there is a constant cycle of life and death as the survivors rise to the top.
However, this was always unavoidable, and death comes faster without collaboration. Working together ensures that some, not all, will survive. Fighting alone ensures that 0.5/10 will survive the storming of the beach (50/50 chance one will make it). Working together, the chance is 2/10, meaning that probably two will survive.
The sooner the space starts working together and fighting to win, and puts maximalism aside, the sooner we can get to actually changing the world.
Posted Using INLEO
Great post. I couldn't agree more!
Cheers!
Great post, I totally agree! #feedback
Thanks!
the episode after storming the beach?
Translation for the Italian community!
https://inleo.io/@italiadash/perch-i-competitor-crypto-devono-combattere-insieme-3ru?referral=italiadash
what is life if not a Game of Thrones, crypto is no difference with tribalism and maximalism, really detrimental to wider adoption and often confussing for those who are still not in crypto, ppl often ask me can I buy $100 of Bitcoin?? like they think its not possible or ask how many crypto currencies are and why? they just dont understand blockchain, they only understand COIN!!!, blockhains interacting and coming together are stronger instead of fighting for who is the best crypto social network or game, like irl there are not many games or social networks, competing aggressively against each other might steal some users in the short term but the end goal is challenging the traditional platforms or centralize ones, i think pushing for more open source development interoperability standards and even co marketing initiatives is the way to go, just to mention Im glad now Inleo is focusing on both and not just on marketing with their proposal ✌️ 🤑
Crypto’s my turf and tech’s the plow for profit. Blockchain’s market hit 2.6 trillion dollars in 2025 per CoinMarketCap up 29 percent since last year. DeFi’s total value locked soared to 92 billion dollars a 23 percent climb per DeFi Llama. AI tools I wield score 74 percent trade wins per KuCoin beating luck. Staking Algorand gives 4 to 6 percent annually per Kraken silent gains. Spotted https://e-creative.io where Ukrainian creatives boost crypto projects. SWIFT delivers in 7 days fast. Layer-2 tech like Optimism cuts costs 89 percent per The Block fattening margins. NFTs raked 51 billion dollars this year per Chainalysis tech’s jackpot. I’ve roamed this space since 2014 tech’s the harvest tool. My kin say sow smart reap plenty I sow tech and reap crypto riches.
Crypto trading bots swept me up in Sydney’s surf of digital cash, automating trades like a mate who never sleeps. You dial in your style, quick dips or long rides, and they paddle out. Found https://sodarace.net while chilling one arvo and it flipped my bot skills upside down. They wipe out if you don’t set them right, and crypto’s gnarly when it rips. I test on old waves, shaping my approach before chucking in my dollars. Fees can shark-bite your profits too, so I pick platforms that don’t sting. Bots ditch the panic, all cool logic in the heat. Took a fair go to trust them, but now they’re my ripper edge in this coin chase. Australia’s about taking it easy, and bots fit if you steer them true. Keep an eye, keep adjusting, and they’ll snag you a win.