RE: Name YOUR decentralized social network?

I sense a degree of barely supressed venom there!

No.

I think maximum division-of-labor is necessary and ideal.
I think our problems in this world stem more from lack of technology to ameliorate power vacuums, than they do from this incorrect notion that people should do what is unnatural.

And then, if we then become convinced of a theory that opposes the establishment consensus, we can then all too easily get frustrated and feel effectively powerless to do anything to change the official narrative.

My mission is to ameliorate the impact and power of any official narrative. Americans used to ignore mostly everything outside their community. Power vacuums enabled behemoths to take control and force us to pay attention to their propaganda.

I see I read you wrong there on division-of-labor.

EDIT 4 days later: Also Oodles is a more catchy name than Uncommons, is only 2 syllables, would standout more in the list at coinmarketcap.com, perhaps is more matched as portal of oodles of DAPPs, conveys the enticing notion of “oddles of cred” and the unique onboarding design. Downside is that Oodles is less serious and prestigious.

Thus perhaps I prefer Oodles for the overarching project and portal name. And Uncommons only for the vetted DAPPs portal.

Just seen your updated edit above.

I appreciate the tricky dilemma between Oodles' more probable widespread appeal and catchiness than the more serious Uncommons. The ticker could be OODL, which stands out and would be memorable. Btw, I see CRED is already used for an alt called "Verify".

I guess Oodle's alliterative comparison with Google could be seen as either positive or negative.

However, it’s also tempting to discard Hyperdata and use only Uncommons for the project name, portal, and ledger technology name.

Looking at it now, from what you say, Hyperdata could be seen as superfluous.