Not to underestimate Larimer but frankly there are too many great guys to fit them all in top 100. Frankly it's not even fair.
Another thing is that these kinds of lists are made for advertising and people who are in the sandbox know not make too much of fluff
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, you've a good point there.
But there are people you miss to recognize and that will cause other people to question the integrity and level of your research.
I get that man, I really do. I think it is guys like us that need to direct the attention of masses to the real people. In the end calling out one magazine or a list would do little in the way of getting theses guys recognition. A more solid approach would be do it directly on social media and stuff.
Frankly I doubt guy of caliber like Larimer even needs that help