You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: FunFair Review-- Why I'm worried (2018)

While I enjoyed the first couple minutes of the video where you describe the project in simple and easy to understand, I disagree with the rest of your unchecked investigation. Honestly it made me question your motives.

WHITE PAPER: There are two types of white papers on the site. The COMMERCIAL and the TECHNICAL. The Commercial has 23 pages and goes in much details. However you only chose to talk about the technical. Why? I don't know. Which is why I am questioning your motive.

TEAM: You are completely wrong about this and does point out the fact that you really have not looked much into this project. At the time when you made the video they may not had direct link to individual's linkedin accounts, but if you even bothered to google one of them you will see their profile. Most of the employees are well experienced in their field. One of them was a project manager of PKR, which was a very successful online poker site founded by Jez San and later was bought by Poker Star.

SPEED: You contradict yourself on this one. Fate channel solves the transaction speed problem and Jez actually explains the process in details in the Commercial white paper and here https://funfair.io/state-channels-in-disguise/

INVESTORS: Again, you are completely wrong. There are investors such as Pantera Captial, KR1, and BlockTower Capital. Personally I wouldn't be surprised if there are no investors in this new volatile market, but the fact stands. There are investors. You just didn't bother to look it up or just outright ignored that.

This project is unique and has a huge potential. The are many challenges the team is constantly working to resolve such as regulations, price fluctuation of the token, and easy and fast access to acquire the tokens legally without having to go to sites like coinbase and binance...
I actually followed some of interviews Jez had a while back and he has a big vision for the game industry using block-chain tech.

For those commenting here saying good investigation, please don't let others do your homework for you.

Sort:  

I agree... Very poorly researched article.