You sad: "There’s no design published on the public Internet for a blockchain, DAG, or other variant of a distributed ledger which has all three qualities: scalable, decentralized, and secure".
Do we need it? Or we can use A (decentralized and secure) and B (scalable and secure) together?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don’t see any way to partition the consensus in two parts as you suggest, which wouldn’t have vulnerabilities.
BTW, I noticed your claps for my Medium posts. Ty.