Hi Sean. My apologies for writing an obviously confusing split comment. I was in a bit of a rush when I wrote it. The first part of it was a comment for you as a follow up to my last comment on the interview with Lynette Zang. The second part is a bit of a rant (that was not at all intended for you) regarding the comment from your guest about whether Clif High thinks Hashgraph is going to succeed.
As you can see, I am now a bit fed up with people treating Clif's remarks and views as gospel. This was by no means to imply that you were doing this or that you have been fawning at his feet. I just notice that a lot of people tend to stop their critical thinking and essentially let Clif do their research and thinking for them whether they realize it or not. I find this dangerous. Additionally, I don't trust Clif for a number of reasons that I've outlined in previous posts that I don't think you've had a chance to read.
Regarding the other cryptos I've mentioned, I am very happy to provide some analysis and posts on these as well. As you can tell, I am very concerned at this point with all the cryptos that have Agenda 2030 objectives built into the core of their business models and strategies. There are many more than the ones that I've mentioned here. (And by the way, this doesn't even begin to cover all the other cryptos using Luciferian symbolism. There are plenty of posts on my blog on these already.)
Please do accept my apologies for coming across as an attack on you. That was not the intent at all. I'm very supportive of all the great work that you do and we are without a doubt on the same side in this spiritual battle.
On a final note Sean, how can I best get information directly to you so that you get a chance to read it? I'm very happy to put together information for you, but honestly don't feel like doing it when I don't know that it's even been read as a general post. Maybe you could drop a comment on my blog with the best way to coordinate. Thanks.