Voting on popular contents and making them more popular is not fault. Actually it's why they're popular.
But if every vote pays out the same, why pay?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Voting on popular contents and making them more popular is not fault. Actually it's why they're popular.
But if every vote pays out the same, why pay?
says the guy who makes more than everyone else
but yeah, this is my only beef with this idea. I think you need at least some front weighting to make people actually try.... though i think the current system has way too much.
"Making a content more popular" is the value later upvoters contributed, why not pay? They evaluate the results done by earlier voters, and confirm it by follow voting, done their work well.