That's really interesting.
Thanks for doing it.
I know some people are reluctant to re-embrace the 50/50 author/curator split, but it looks like it would be closer to a 65/45 split in practice, which I think many would find more palatable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I wonder how this would work for folks leasing to bid-bots? Do you think they would be more inclined to pull SP back out to curate with?
I went into detail here although I didn't touch on bidbots at the time.
We can't stop self upvoting, so we have to offer a better use for that voting power.
Curation is and always has been the answer. It's no surprise, based on Markymark's observations here, that careful, considered curation isn't a priority.
I can see a real shift of appetite here, which is fantastic to see :)
Cheers Matt, just read that post, a fine effort (so take my reward here retrospectively)
Yes indeed, if only the ones with the appetite held the SP to feed the hungry. It's happening though, slowly..
This is an extremely important point. @blocktrades, take note of this
well, 65/35 @mattclarke ;)
Lol. I meant 65/35.
Derp! I read it as 65/35 anyway, so we good ;)
65/45 would be 110 percent - Sounds good but would lead to more inflation.
Ah yes down here others have noticed as well ;)
I can't edit either, as he's screen grabbed it :p
You can edit it and should, just add a little note saying you edited it, that's what I always do.
It's all good :) we're all friends here.
Besides, I noticed before anyone else.
That's gotta count for something.
That totally counts!