I still feel new in the platform and of the issues that most call my attention is the way of curing; not everyone thinks alike, many opinions with various aspects, but all agree on the phrase quality content, which in my opinion is totally subjective, since what is quality for me is not for another, I would like to quote a little from the publication:
Being active on the platform on a daily basis and with everything that is practically public and open source combined with a lot of statistics and reports that you can verify, you see a lot of things that are diminishing. One thing I've noticed that I may be guilty of (though I try not to) is abusing your autovote. Let's face it, many authors know that they have auto-votes waiting for them as long as they publish almost anything. At some point they will start to publish almost anything without the care of quality. They often get so used to it that they take it for granted, stop worrying about the interaction in their publications or about the social aspect of the platform. It becomes like a job and they like it.
First of all I like to recognize that sometimes they can reach a level of comfort, where little is done for the platform, I don't know if it is a good example for those who are trying to succeed, because the idea is always to innovate and share quality or at least something you feel comfortable with but always giving a little more.
On the other hand many people who are here do not trust the growth of the platform, that can be so true and this can be seen in the publications and interactions perhaps not with the passion that steemit deserves.
In short, many important points to touch on regarding this topic, it is still good that you share your thoughts and allow us to involve your own in its publication.
Maybe my English can be confusing, we can blame it on the translator.