which has (mostly) the same rules except that it removes the power of the attacking coalition to control the system.
Only works if the forking party are willing to fork out the accounts that tried to or were involved in the takeover. Hive would be a much different place if one of the causes of the fork were removed, and that was dissent over the use of the ninja mined stake. it never should have been forked over.
The steps being taken to secure the governance is minimal at most. How many people even know who the top twenty witnesses are off the top of their heads? How many of those witnesses even bother to put a monthly post out? How many of them have posted or talked about the upcoming HF 25?
A couple, and a few of those were ones that wanted last minute changes to the reward system.
At some point the community is going to go away, not many will stand for new chains to keep repeating the same errors or ignoring the causes of the forked chains. I used to believe we had a strong community, and in many respects we do, but what we do not have is a community interested in the foundation, as is witnessed by the lack of people trying to help with HF testing. I tried a couple times, I try to keep up with the HF issues and the testing, I saw you try to help, I saw what I felt were a lot of ignorant remarks made on your try to help with the testing.
People want decentralization, they just do not want to do any of the work involved in strengthening that decentralization.