The last time I took MTG to task she was flip flopping on about Rochelle Walensky killing babies over her recommendation pregnant women get the covid shot while being invested herself in the companies that were producing the shots. When confronted with her own apparent hypocrisy of the shots injuring, killing, harming millions of others while being invested in them, she shrugs it off that she doesn't know what or where her investment advisors invest her money.
Weird how much Madge actually manages to know or not know depending upon which way the wind blows. Right now they aren't blowing to hard in her favor. A few months ago during polling done in Georgia on a list of names asking people who they'd favor for a senate run, Madge came in last on the list. Who could really blame the constituents of the state of Georgia after having seen headlines and videos of a town hall meeting she held after Trump's re-election where protesters were dragged, tased or removed from her meeting, even a man who merely held up a sign that said, "jail for inside traders" was summoned by the police and escorted out of the building. Madge justifies the removals as all belonging to one form or another of leftist groups trying to destroy America, but one would be hard pressed to try and figure out what side the silent protester was on.
Madge, isn't, by any stretch of the imagine a likeably individual unless one is focused on the full agenda of President Trump. Which, toward the end of the meeting is apparent when a loud protester is seen being dragged and tased out of the meeting while others stood up chanting USA, USA, USA, clapping and themselves being loud. After the meeting a reporter ask her why people can't ask questions publicly. She responds that they haven't been to one of her town halls to see that's how she always runs her town hall meetings. No one is allowed to asked questions openly, instead they have to pose any questions on her website when they sign up to attend the meeting. She said she use to let people write down their questions, they'd go in a fishbowl, she'd pick out the questions but it was hard to read some people's handwriting. If you listen to her town hall meeting, it would be rather hard to try and discern why all the questions are about the Trump agenda and not one single question is asked about things she intends to do for her district. Not one single question ask about what she is working on for her district, that same district she is always saying she will worked hard for the people in her district and the American people, with, apparently, a sole emphasis on the latter, which makes it suspect the questions aren't coming from constituents and rather a preprogrammed churn of national political propaganda.
For example there was a rather high focus on what DOGE, of which she repeatedly emphasized she was the committee chairperson for, getting rid of fraud, waste and abuse. One of the items on DOGE targeted list was the National Public Radio (NPR), and the Public Broadcasting System (PBS). I must admit that every time I go to a town hall meeting, the top of my list always involves what those buggers at NPR and PBS are up to. Of course I am being fastidious there because when I go to a town hall meeting, I could care less and worry more about what's happening in my local surroundings. For Madge it serves up a prime time to divide up the masses and remind them they are under attack from the left.
Madge: As the chair of DOGE committee we looked into NPR and PBS and we had them come before us on our committee as witnesses and we can go ahead and played that clip now Kala. (which is one of numerous videos of Madge talking on national political matters) Corporation for Public Broadcasting is using taxpayers dollars to actively suppress the (inaudible), diverse view points and to produce some of the most outlandish, ludicrous content. After listening to what we heard today, we will be calling for the complete and total defund and dismantling of the Corporation For Public Broadcasting. You can hate us on your own dime, but people don't have to pay for that."
Now that goes counter to what she told Dana Bush in an interview the other day when trying to defend Tucker Carlson, and her own trip to speak at a conference once held by Nick Fuentes. In the interview she told Bush that back in 2022 when she went to speak at the conference she wasn't aware of his views. Which many would consider also as containing outlandish and ludicrous content. I admit I am somewhat aware of things he has said written in quotes or memes produced but if I was going to speak at a conference he was holding, knowing what little I did know, I'd surely take a hard look at what's behind the man before I made such a commitment, and most definitely if I was a representative holding a congressional seat. Fuentes himself came out and countered what she said, having said she was totally aware of his views. In response to all that, she told Bush:
Madge: First of all I defend every single persons free speech rights. I think that's incredibly important. So I don't apologize for that, and I don't believe in canceling people. I think it's important for people like you and Tucker Carlson to interview everyone. I don't believe in, in trying to cancel someone by refusing to interview them and question them.
Apparently she prefers to interview them first before canceling them. If it's outlandish, ludicrous rhetoric from the left, that can't be tolerated like outlandish, ludicrous rhetoric from the right. Which now she'd like to humbly apologize for when confronted by Bush that until it was directed at her, she never spoke out about.
Bush: We have seen these attacks from the president at other people. It's not new, and I haven't heard you speak out about it until it was directed at you.
Madge: I think that's fair criticism, and I'd like to say, humbly, I am sorry for taking part in the toxic politics.
For Madge, it's whichever way the wind blows, and right now the prevailing winds aren't blowing in her favor, trying to rebrand herself into a humble, apologetic human being is going to be incredibly hard no matter how many names she pushes to get published from that Epstein list, at this point, a bit of humble pie may not equate to being trustworthy.