"Common sense should prevail that once fraud had been established full scale investigations of the evidence presented would prevail. There'd be no stopping an investigation into a crime of that magnitude."
A caveat here is that the fox is guarding the chicken coop. Where's your common sense now?
Regarding crimes of that magnitude, how about the sinking of the Maine? Claiming the attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise? The Gulf of Tonkin incident? 9/11? C'mon man! Corn Pop is a bad dude, but that's a bunch of malarkey.
"...congress couldn't ignore."
There is no corruption so blatant, no crime so horrific, no treachery so vile, that Congress can't ignore it. That's what they do, because that's what is necessary to subjugate us to their corrupters.
"...the election was rigged to go down that way, no one really stole it."
A rigged election is a stolen election. When people say the election was stolen, that's what they mean.
"...it took them over twenty two months to tell us..."
Were you asleep for two years? The election wasn't over before proof it was rigged was public information. This outfit you are pointing at didn't even exist during the election. Why are you pointing to them as bellwethers of the election fraud?
I have been stating the election was fraud since the election. Plenty of better folks than I were too.
"Trump can't be on both sides of the fence."
That's what he does. America First, but MIGA. He's a mugwump, a bird that sits on a fence with his mug on one side and his wump on the other.
Basically, however, I sense we agree that Trump and his opponents are essentially the same kind of grifter. They're all for sale to the highest bidder. They are just useful for different purposes due to their different skillsets, so selected for the purposes the WEF reckons they fit best.
My reference was in regards to something other than individuals who have stepped forward with snippets of fraud in a particular area, like what happened here in the UP, the investigation in WI of nursing homes where fraud occurred they are still investigating, a couple of others who had the guts to download the voter data and are being heavily prosecuted for stealing it rather than what the content showed, and a controlled audit like we seen in AZ where the layers of bureaucracy it was handed to investigated it found ways to keep it sitting around on someone's desk until the expiration date. I was talking about a leaker like a Snowden, or similar to Assange releasing indisputable evidence from within the system that ran the whole scheme nationwide. That kind of magnitude.
In the eyes of many stolen means stolen by one side, go on any blog and that's all you hear is stolen by the democrats. They have never stopped to consider the whole thing was rigged up by both sides. Hence my reference rigged for differentiation purposes.
It's Trump's think tank, a continuation for pushing his agenda and part of his agenda has always been pushing election fraud.
That's why I do these ops, if it awakens even one person's eyes it's worth it.
Not in 2016. That was Shillary's turn.
He hasn't shut up about losing the 2020 election since the day he lost it. Furthermore he told everyone he was going to lose it before it even happened. He was giving a speech and said covid, covid, covid, blah, blah, blah he went on and than said "by the way you won't hear about it anymore after Nov 4th"