No. This isn’t “another way to pull more from the chain.” The chain is already pulling from everyone via DHF issuance — this just makes it measurable and attributable.
And the “who does this account belong to?” angle is a distraction.
Judge the output:
public JSON dataset,
documented assumptions,
reproducible methodology,
and on-chain verifiable inputs.
If the numbers are wrong, call the numbers. If the model is wrong, name the rule.
If the only objection is “I don’t like anonymous accounting,” that’s basically an argument for staying blind.
The who does it belong to was a serious question.
Does it belong to those same as already pulling the rewards out and killing the HIVE value.
For me (thehive) I have already been told I will be finished on HIVE for my opinions.
I am just going through accounts no taking the little bits and pooling for the cash out.
Your site does highlight some interesting things. But the response you will get, will be.
Invest more to get more HIVE power it up and increase the value of your voice.