Idea 1:
Create a staggered APR and work better on external offerings, better apps, and community-backed marketing by working with experts.
Month 1-2: 15% → 12% (savings: ~330K HBD/year)
Month 3-4: 12% → 9% (savings: ~330K HBD/year)
If the market recovers by 50%, it can be set at 12%, observing the 24-hour buying and selling capacity on exchanges.
Currently, we have very few products that innovate on a large scale.
Idea 2:
Implement improvements in the DHF or create a grant-based competition to seek a balance.
Very interesting way to look at it, whether or not the community decides to do this is another question however.
These kinds of ideas have been proposed countless times over the years - sadly, no changes have been forthcoming and not really even much of a discussion among key stakeholders (in public, that I have seen).
Yes! Although I believe one of Hive's main problems is the lack of in-depth analysis of metrics, we at Hivecreators have been working on this for months, redefining some things, especially the documentation, to start from scratch. The technology isn't the issue; it's the weakness in Layer 2 and the lack of a solid, overarching narrative about Hive's core technology.
Blockchain is a good product that meets industry needs, but it lacks a strong layer of innovation and competition in Layer 2, which would attract external suppliers. This requires shaping the core communication through marketing strategies at different scales, leading us to ask: How do we target Hive's four main markets (creators, players, devs, investors) with a single narrative, without the backing of numerous dApps?
It's just my thought, I could be very wrong.