very easy to talk about the need to make a small bit of money with self voting and small groups when around 80 out of the 490 votes to you were from @cervantes
I regret their confusion again, it is not spam, it is a relevant subject to the conversation, the author speaks of self-vows and the graphics speak of someone who votes himself.
If you did not see the 3 accounts belong to the same author :) and all votes go towards the ... :)
lamento su confusión otra vez, no es spam, es un tema relevante a la conversación, el autor habla de los autovotos y las graficas hablan de alguien que se auto vota.
Si usted no vio las 3 cuentas propias al mismo autor :) y todos los votos van hacia el ... :)
There is no confusion, you try to say his voting is bad,you are part of large group that votes each other why does an individual who does with small amount matter?
I count 8 accounts below exchanges votes often and with thousands worth of SP.
No hay confusión, intenta decir que su voto es malo, usted es parte de un grupo grande que se vota entre sí, ¿por qué un individuo que lo hace con una cantidad pequeña importa?
Cuento 8 cuentas por debajo de los intercambios de votos a menudo y con miles de dólares en SP.
and the most important, I HAD NEVER SAID I AM A CURATOR, or have asked sp to anyone to support me in false projects;)
I'm just a writer and I just have to account for my votes to myself;)
The problem begins when someone cheats a community, whales and everyone pretending to help :)
Ahh yes, i am very happy :) a real curation group vote for me.. and they vote for a lot of people... but @cervantes its a real proyect to help people... not a scam to have money and dont vote anybody.
is all steem power belonging @nnnarvaez and if he had himself he would make more than having it spread between different accounts like this problem with whats displayed in post is no content and voting.
es todo poder de poder perteneciente a @nnnarvaez y si tuviera él mismo tendría más que tenerlo repartido entre diferentes cuentas como este problema con lo que se muestra en la publicación no hay contenido y votación
add to that the whales behind him, @chitty@austingbank who are unaware that he does not vote for the community that says he votes;)
Because that is the central theme, he asks for help supposedly to support the Spanish-speaking community and uses the power of vote itself ... if he did not say that it is to help anyone, he could do with his sp what he wanted, it is morally wrong to impersonate a curator to gain whale and community sp on his person. this is the scam :)
Well i am tired for today, to was a pleasure to talk about this, but tomorrow are the long day, you are invite to read about this in a post i am write now, i think tomorrow or the sunday i will up.
I am very sorry for your confusion ... I think I have not said anything, who has made value judgments is the author of the post
He said:
Lamento mucho su confusión... creo que yo no he dicho nada, quien ha hecho juicios de valor es el autor del post.
Cuando escribió:
@michelcamacaro
im not confused i see the multiples times you spammed this post with images on voting and images from the blockchain history.
you saying this is a joke when you get paid so much votes from @cervantes
No estoy confundido. Veo los múltiplos por los que spamé esta publicación con imágenes de votación e imágenes del historial de blockchain.
Estás diciendo que esto es una broma cuando te pagan tantos votos de
I regret their confusion again, it is not spam, it is a relevant subject to the conversation, the author speaks of self-vows and the graphics speak of someone who votes himself.
If you did not see the 3 accounts belong to the same author :) and all votes go towards the ... :)
lamento su confusión otra vez, no es spam, es un tema relevante a la conversación, el autor habla de los autovotos y las graficas hablan de alguien que se auto vota.
Si usted no vio las 3 cuentas propias al mismo autor :) y todos los votos van hacia el ... :)
@michelcamacaro
There is no confusion, you try to say his voting is bad,you are part of large group that votes each other why does an individual who does with small amount matter?
I count 8 accounts below exchanges votes often and with thousands worth of SP.
No hay confusión, intenta decir que su voto es malo, usted es parte de un grupo grande que se vota entre sí, ¿por qué un individuo que lo hace con una cantidad pequeña importa?
Cuento 8 cuentas por debajo de los intercambios de votos a menudo y con miles de dólares en SP.
Source: steemreports.com/@michelcamacaro
lol jajajajajajajja you are so funny :) see that.
#my outgoing votes ;) see the numbers lol
and the most important, I HAD NEVER SAID I AM A CURATOR, or have asked sp to anyone to support me in false projects;)
I'm just a writer and I just have to account for my votes to myself;)
The problem begins when someone cheats a community, whales and everyone pretending to help :)
Cervantes its a real curation group ;) lol
you individually are in voting group of tens of thousands in SP
Estás votando individualmente en un grupo de decenas de miles en SP
you understand what a curator?
or do I have to explain it to you?
Really, I repeat, who complains about selftvotes the author ... :)
Ahh yes, i am very happy :) a real curation group vote for me.. and they vote for a lot of people... but @cervantes its a real proyect to help people... not a scam to have money and dont vote anybody.
@michelcamacaro
i didn't say it was
what i said was, its easy to comment with images how others make money when you get paid with less work.
No dije que era
Lo que dije fue que es fácil comentar con imágenes cómo otros ganan dinero cuando se les paga con menos trabajo.
You are right it is very hard to give yourself votes all day and say that you help a community.
Usted tiene razón, es muy duro darse votos a uno mismo todo el dia y decir que se ayuda a una comunidad.
when you give votes to each other with tens of thousands worth of SP is worse.
cuando se dan votos el uno al otro con decenas de miles de SP es peor
In the same way, I repeat, the value judgment did the author, I do not :)
De Igual manera, le repito, el juicio de valor lo hizo el autor, yo no :)
@michelcamacaro
you do the same but in different way by scale of 100+
haces lo mismo pero de diferente manera por escala de 100+
jajajajaj no nono you are very bad, he is the same person voting for him self... ;P hahahah realy you are funny or are the same author lol...
that is indefensible
@walo, @nnnarvaez, @bebeth and @reveur are acounts of the same person.. you know???
@walo has 1164SP from @nnnarvaez
@reveur has 720SP and is radio project account.
@bebeth has 3400 SP and is a curator project account.
@nnnarvaez has 846 SP main account
is all steem power belonging @nnnarvaez and if he had himself he would make more than having it spread between different accounts like this problem with whats displayed in post is no content and voting.
es todo poder de poder perteneciente a @nnnarvaez y si tuviera él mismo tendría más que tenerlo repartido entre diferentes cuentas como este problema con lo que se muestra en la publicación no hay contenido y votación
add to that the whales behind him, @chitty @austingbank who are unaware that he does not vote for the community that says he votes;)
Because that is the central theme, he asks for help supposedly to support the Spanish-speaking community and uses the power of vote itself ... if he did not say that it is to help anyone, he could do with his sp what he wanted, it is morally wrong to impersonate a curator to gain whale and community sp on his person. this is the scam :)
this is the grafic of a curator?????
http://www.steemreports.com/outgoing-votes-info/?account=bebeth
Estoy haciéndome la misma pregunta , haciendo todo un ciclo de auto-voto pero armando critica para vender su "proyecto de ayuda"
Well i am tired for today, to was a pleasure to talk about this, but tomorrow are the long day, you are invite to read about this in a post i am write now, i think tomorrow or the sunday i will up.
Sorry about my bad english :)