Maybe they felt the 100% inflation + curation rewards were too high and wanted to pump post payouts to hype Steem even more knowing it'll pump shortly after payouts went out and Steem went to top 3 briefly.
I think dan had the best interests of steem in mind up to near the end.
Once it was clear that he wasn't in charge, i think that changed.
I know stinc has intentionally put us here.
Why it is insisted that they run things at this point seems counter productive, to me.
I am fairly certain that this whine is at its time.
So, count me in on the flag pool and a change to the curve, just not the one proposed.
I think rewarding investors is good bidness, but not to the point that they break the game.
Maybe they felt the 100% inflation + curation rewards were too high and wanted to pump post payouts to hype Steem even more knowing it'll pump shortly after payouts went out and Steem went to top 3 briefly.
There are many moving parts to steem.
Does the fork pass the witnesses any time soon?
Or, do we keep waiting for smteees!?
I was but mostly just lurking, if I recall it was before payouts started and according to others was mainly a decision by @dan for unknown reasons.
I think dan had the best interests of steem in mind up to near the end.
Once it was clear that he wasn't in charge, i think that changed.
I know stinc has intentionally put us here.
Why it is insisted that they run things at this point seems counter productive, to me.
I am fairly certain that this whine is at its time.
So, count me in on the flag pool and a change to the curve, just not the one proposed.
I think rewarding investors is good bidness, but not to the point that they break the game.