Voted for
- Is an illusion. An insipid thing. Vagary of perception. Temporary construct of a feeble human intellect trying desperately to justify an existence that is without meaning or purpose.
Whats with your homophobic question? Rather its "between a man and woman" and or a man and a man or a woman and a woman, it would still be equatable. I guess a "Vagary of perception" is an issue....
Do not be offended. There is nothing homophobic about this question. And there is nothing wrong with being gay or lesbian either. I took the man and woman example, because I am straight, and that is the classic family model, and I am interested in experiences based on that. And no children will be born with man and man, neither with woman and a woman. And the nature of the two genders are generally very different. Because of these things, love is totally/entirely different in your examples (man and a man, woman and a woman), so I think that it should be asked in another poll. I do not have problems with gay/lesbian people. What more, maybe it would have been better if I would have been a gay person back in 2007. At least I would probably not have gone through that misery with that woman in middle school (see the description in this post, if you have not read it so far).
Dont say homophobic things if you dont want to be called out. Love is NOT different for a man and man or a woman and a woman. You saying that is literally homophobic. But, "Dont get offended" for being called out...