"I used to respect you but now..."
That fake-ass ploy has long since been worn out. And in this context, anyone with half a brain can see through what you are doing. It is not at all genuine, not at all honest, not at all real--just like the thug you're trying to cover for. Give it up.
Hard not to laugh here. Which one of you is this? Marcus? Michael? Cody? That other dude whose name escapes me, who is Kokesh’s current campaign manager...?
You mean me? No I am not him. ;o)
I can understand why you and Larken are fed up with the non believers. One needs to pay good attention to the evidence and the details. The story is a bit involved. It is not easy to have a calm two way conversation on Steemit. I would ask both of you to be more patient if you want more people to believe your side. And to Joe Public, there is evidence, in my opinion, that at least Ben intended to violate the NAP, as explained in another comment of mine in this post.
Thanks for the response.
I have to disagree with you on Larken, I know that he does not like Adam and I imagine that these two have been at it in Archopolco. With Larken's email message evidence I really think he was trying to keep it under the radar. But if Adam is twisting the story, which is what Larken's evidence is showing, I can understand why Larken would come out with this video only after Adam's alleged deception to keep Jeff from having to defend his decision. It is consistent with what I perceive Larken's character to be. You can see this as well in the other video from Larken that kafkanarchy84 keeps refering to in comments on recent Kokesh's posts. I imagine that you have been following those as well.
Larken says it like it is, which is why it is good for him to sometimes avoid saying it like it is, and other times to come out and say it like it is.
With the perceived threat from Ben and likely in association Adam towards kafkanarchy84 and possibly Larken one would have to understand the emotional outrage from both kafkanarchy84 and Larken.
In my opinion the one who is " just waiting for an opportunity to fuck things up for Adam even more", is someone else.
NAP in theory is a great idea but in reality there will always be aggression. You just have to do the best you can to avoid being the aggressor yourself as much as possible.
I am staying tuned, this story is getting interesting.
Is downvoting on youtube a violation of the non aggression principle?
Is leaving a bad review on a book because you didn't like it, a violation of the non aggression principle?
Is removing a comment on a website that you own, a violation of the non aggression principle?
I see it not as a violation of the non aggression principle.
Someone not talking to you in the way you want is not a violation.
For if the NAP was violated it would justify you using force to defend yourself.
And someone saying a bunch of words or flagging, does not justify that.
Example
If someone would say to me, I hate you or you are an ...... (fill in the blanks), not talking PC enough, or flagging me for whatever reason, he or she is not violating me or the non aggression principle.
Politeness has nothing to do with it. That is not what it's about.
I'm not addressing thoughts or what someone said to someone else, in this reply I'm just addressing the NAP and what it means and what not.
Hope you understand.
he's me, kafka.