Image courtesy of Wikipedia
Notice of Pending Lawsuit
In an historic move on behalf of disclosure of the true intentions behind geoengineering and the many questionable health impacts it entails, environmental group Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering (LASG) has served a 33-page notice of intent to file a lawsuit. Named in the notice are at least 36 "violators" including representatives of multiple US government defendants, which include the US Air Force, US Navy, US Federal Aviation Administration, and other agencies located in Washington, D.C., and the State of California.
According to the notice's summary section, the group alleges:
"In this time of disclosure, the citizens of this nation – indeed, of this planet – deserve to know the nature and extent of the aerosol spraying programs (“Programs”) occurring in the skies over California and its waters (both coastal and inland), as well as across this country and beyond its borders. These Programs include so-called "solar radiation management" (SRM), “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering" (SAG) and “stratospheric aerosol injection” (SAI) programs, as well as other aerosol spraying programs being conducted by various entities, including, but not limited to, the US government and its contractors and affiliates.
Beyond the fictional defense that “itʼs not happening” and that the artificial clouds are “just persistent contrails” from commercial aircraft, the actual Programs are releasing nano-particulates of toxic materials, including, but not limited to, aluminum oxide, barium, and strontium, into the atmosphere at high levels in the dubious effort to impact the climate or for other reasons unknown. CIA Director John Brennan confirmed on June 29, 2016, that SAI Programs are anything but fiction.
Based on the law of gravity, such toxic dispersions are coming down to ground-level waters, and contaminating our air, soil and water. The resulting damage to our environment and human health is widespread."
To read the the full text of the notice, click here.
For those readers unfamiliar with geoengineering, climate engineering, and weather modification, the author cites a "tame" definition of geoengineering from Wikipedia, as follows:
"Climate engineering, also referred to as geoengineering or climate intervention, is the deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of limiting adverse climate change. Climate engineering is an umbrella term for two types of measures: carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management. Carbon dioxide removal addresses the cause of climate change by removing one of the greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere. Solar radiation management attempts to offset effects of greenhouse gases by causing the Earth to absorb less solar radiation."
While the stated purposes for geoengineering activities may indeed be genuine, the manner in which these activities are conducted, in addition to their consequences on the global population, include the adverse health concerns to humans, animals, plants and ecosystems. The notice implies that geoengineering activities may not have been adequately researched or disclosed in a manner that provided sufficient time for people to react.
Toxins Delivered by Air
While the notice specifically addresses the quality of drinking water, the method of delivery of toxic chemicals to drinking water includes delivery as an "aerosol", which is the seemingly harmless name for the many "chemtrails" one sees strewn across the sky at all times of the day and night.
A Long List of Poisons
Independent reports from across the globe state that chemtrails dispersed everywhere indeed cause concern for world health everywhere. The chemicals may include toxic substances like those listed in the notice above, but also may contain:
- aluminum - an element commonly associated with Alzheimer's and other neurological disorders
- arsenic - a commonly known biotoxin
- barium
- boron
- strontium
- cadmium
- chromium
- nickel
- thorium
- desiccated blood
- mold spores
- yellow fungal mycotoxins
- ethylene dibromide
- polymer fibers
And the list goes on.
Why?
Put aside all conventional "scientific" thinking and ask yourself this on an intuitive level, if indeed you do take the time to even wonder.
Assume that these compounds do not exist in the atmosphere in nature, disperse for thousands of miles, and eventually fall from air onto the water and soil. Given that little to no isolated testing nor disclosure (the the impending lawsuit demanding such disclosure) regarding the effects of geoengineering has been conducted nor disclosed...
What is the intention behind loading our skies, our food, and our water with so many poisonous compounds?
I believe they are in a mess now.. They have been doing this for 70 years to cover up what is probably largely man made global warming. When they stop it is going to get hotter, apparently the OZone layer is has suffering from this geo engineering too.
Governments, including the US, have population control agendas too. This fits right in line with a motivation to continue to forcefully enslave a population.
The "why" is the same as GMOs and chemical pesticides/herbicides -- PATENTS
The document did not source CIA director Brennan's comment. In a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, Brennan said that he personally was interested in the potential SAI, not that they were already doing it.
https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html
"Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI."
Congratulations @johnmelendez! You have received a personal award!
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
SteemitBoard World Cup Contest - Round of 16 - Day 4
Participate in the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @good-karma and @lukestokes
Congratulations @johnmelendez! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!