People are really ignoring the power that token holders has. They are the one electing BP's. So in the long run, their interest will be protected. It's all about TRUST. U will not use a system if you don't trust it. I think BPs acted promptly to secure members properties, which is define some how in the constitution. It's really new in the industry and we should discuss and contribute to make it better.
It's not a unilateral power, it's a process that can either be respected or ignored by block producers.
leaving BPs to make decisions, what could possibly go wrong? next you hear is they censor accounts...
Then they are voted out, you're selectively interpreting information and seemingly ignoring the economics of DPoS
People are really ignoring the power that token holders has. They are the one electing BP's. So in the long run, their interest will be protected. It's all about TRUST. U will not use a system if you don't trust it. I think BPs acted promptly to secure members properties, which is define some how in the constitution. It's really new in the industry and we should discuss and contribute to make it better.
Agreeing with you @ash. The EOS blockchain is going to allow great things, but freedom isn't necessarily one of them.