Thanks!
Regarding article 1. I think everyone agrees on the goals:
- maintaining sovereignty / independence from state actors.
- keeping our ability to combat non-violent, non-physically-aggressive crimes like fraud.
The only disagreement is whether a categorical rejection of non-initiation of aggressions helps or harms these goals. I'm sure we'll come together after some discussion.
Especially because this only touches edge cases in EOS.
All good. I heard talk of a convention even! The most significant innovation in Eos could turn out to be it's governance. Very interested to see how it evolves and how we choose to use it.