Sort:  

Wow, you said with full confidence that Casper has moved around since then; however when asked for proof you just did not bother to point dan in the correct direction??

Full confidence:

~~~ embed:ethereum/comments/6qm0y2/is_the_ethereum_team_defending_their_ground/dkzoj5t/?utm_content=permalink&utm_medium=user&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=frontpage reddit metadata:fGV0aGVyZXVtfGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJlZGRpdC5jb20vci9ldGhlcmV1bS9jb21tZW50cy82cW0weTIvaXNfdGhlX2V0aGVyZXVtX3RlYW1fZGVmZW5kaW5nX3RoZWlyX2dyb3VuZC9ka3pvajV0Lz91dG1fY29udGVudD1wZXJtYWxpbmsmdXRtX21lZGl1bT11c2VyJnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9cmVkZGl0JnV0bV9uYW1lPWZyb250cGFnZXw= ~~~

Knowing it's been in active development/isn't static (it's arguably the most important piece of Ethereum's roadmap) and having at my fingertips the most recent documents are in no way mutually exclusive. Again, I'm not developing Casper nor critiquing it.

So in essence, you are basically assuming that his review is stale, because it is 2 years old?

I read it. It's insubstantial and pre-dates most of the Casper research. It may be 100% right in the end, we do not know the future, but yes, it's stale and not up to date.

~~~ embed:ethereum/comments/6qm0y2/is_the_ethereum_team_defending_their_ground/dkzoj5t/?utm_content=permalink&utm_medium=user&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=frontpage reddit metadata:fGV0aGVyZXVtfGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJlZGRpdC5jb20vci9ldGhlcmV1bS9jb21tZW50cy82cW0weTIvaXNfdGhlX2V0aGVyZXVtX3RlYW1fZGVmZW5kaW5nX3RoZWlyX2dyb3VuZC9ka3pvajV0Lz91dG1fY29udGVudD1wZXJtYWxpbmsmdXRtX21lZGl1bT11c2VyJnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9cmVkZGl0JnV0bV9uYW1lPWZyb250cGFnZXw= ~~~