This - I'm going to be really, really choked if Dan snubs STEEM and BTS and makes us all buy ETH to participate in the ICO. Really??? I'm going to have to sell STEEM/BTS/BTC and buy ETH to get EOS? Why in the hell would Dan want to boost the liquidity and market cap of ETH? Imagine the huge liquidity that would flow into and through BTS if the EOS ICO was through BTS. It would be a massive boon for BTS. What am I missing? Why the ETH love???
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I bought BTS in anticipation of it being hosted on the dex. It would have been a great opportunity to demonstrate how well graphene works along with the transactions per second
well, it shouldn't be a great surprise - wonder if anyone read this post of Dan
Daniel Larimer - Co-Founder of BitShares & Steemit
and paid attention eg to these points in the Social Lessons part:
So while Dan has no problems mentioning his role of the BitShares' & Steem creator (for his own good), he does not feel and have any obligations toward his creatures
I don't blame him. A project or a company isn't the work of one man. If the community and rest of the founding team see the project differently than he does, then something has to give. From what I've heard about EOS, we're not going to need BitShares for anything -- like Dan said.
so do I :) but we have to keep that in mind following Dan's projects
$31 Billion marketcap, plus when EOS fund-raise still active ETH > BITCOIN eventually... He will be wrong only if BTS & STEEM together will surpass ETH.
It makes sense, it brings Ethereum money into the ecosystem. Right now Bitshares and steem are such a circle jerk. EOS as a competitor to ethereum will also attract those interested in ethereum.