You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Does Freedom Require Radical Transparency or Radical Privacy?

in #eos8 years ago (edited)

I agree with much of what is being said here, @dan, and some of the ideas in this post are amazing, but privacy is a fundamental, natural law right deriving from the reality of individual self-ownership. Don’t you agree? Privacy is not the culprit here, in my view, the bad actors are. Even totally innocent individuals relish privacy.

Sort:  

Fundamental natural law right that is in contradiction to my right to observe. No such thing as fundamental natural law. See my articles on constitution.

Unless I’m misunderstanding, your response here is somewhat telling Dan...especially with the latest announcement of “Voice”.
You believe you have a "right to observe”? Or are you simply mocking the right to privacy? Either way, your answer is disappointing to say the least.