I understand that you are saying transparency is superior to privacy, but shouldn’t people have the freedom to choose whether their transactions are public or private even if there are inherent risks in attempting to make data private?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
According to the non aggression principal we wouldn't want to force anyone to do anything against their will. We want to create the environment where people will in the long term and in the majority of cases chose transparency over privacy on most matters.
We wouldn't want or expect transparency from political activist as this would put them in danger but we sure would want to push huge corporation and government toward more transparency. This is likely to happen if the value of cryptocurrencies continue to go up as the biggest fortune could end up all being on a publique blockchain.