I can only repeat the question already asked by others: why do you bother to use a blockchain then? Everything you describe can be achieved with the standard centralized technology and a multi-sig account.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Unlike centralized technology, blockchains are highly censorship resistant. Not censorship proof (since miners can collude), but highly censorship resistant. They are resistant because: (1) getting different miners with different political and economic agendas to collude is difficult and costly, (2) minors are only likely to collude when doing so obviously supports the network and token value and not when doing so undermines them (game theory 101), and (3) a sufficient number of miners generally cannot be legally compelled to collude.
The DAO situation provides a perfect example. Miners will only fork if they believe doing so supports network and token value and is worth the cost. And even if authorities wanted to compel miners to make DAO participants whole via a fork, they couldn't (both as a practical matter and as a legal matter).
My dream is to make blockchain censorship resistant both from the outside and the inside - there should be no way a majority could blacklist a single person and shut him up. As long as you play by the rules hard-coded in the blockchain, nobody, even the majority should be able to exclude you. This is how I understand being censorship resistant.