In its crusade against 'fake news', Facebook has vowed to fight for impartiality. However, when it comes to fact-checking, it seems to rely on sources, which have links to the US government, and renowned political meddlers.
For more than two years, the social media giant has been seeking to convince the public that it does its best to take a stand against malicious disinformation spread through its network and presented a whole bunch of instruments aimed at revealing and countering false narratives.
It appears, though, that Facebook heavily relies on decisions taken by some third-parties in its 'anti-disinformation' policy.
Submissions from the so-called fact-checkers – alongside some feedback from users – seem to be the primary source on which Facebook relies when saying a post is 'false'.
At first I was thinking maybe give them time...if someone doesn't decide to break them up because of their horrible actions...but this kinda seems deliberate. Not sure why. Maybe some idiot did it to counteract their supposed liberal bias. They're probably not going to be liberally biased anymore...if they ever were.
Good research RT!
"...the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network or IFCN"
The name is a joke itself.
They are all corrupt!
The name is a joke itself.
I think I saw Soros in a Zombie movie recently... He doesn’t even need any makeup, they just walk him out on screen 🤣
Posted using Partiko iOS
I didn't know the foundation Teyit
Posted using Partiko Android
Great
Posted using Partiko Android