You called my questions and observations Nonsense and said I was spamming, then told me that I am a lost cause, and you won't bother with me?, and now you want to claim that it was nice, your opinion matters. Do you understand what antigenic markers mean? or that it is the only way viruses are identified? at least as markers for viruses, and even that is very reaching as those antigens haven't been shown to do that, it has only been assumed that it works that way and not the other way or that antigens themselves actually work as they were believe to work for ever (probably don't know that just recently a study has been published showing that the mechanism of one key for one virus as they thought antigens worked was false) because even antigens being doesn't mean that they happen because of the virus, as I have brought into question, or that you failed to provide ONE source for your claims when I asked you for them REPEATEDLY, that's why you were in fact spamming nonsense and I called it instead scientific fraud, which WAS a nice way of saying:
CONSIDER THE METHODS, CONSIDER THE FACTS, STOP REPEATING WHAT HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN AS FACT, AND PLEASE SOURCE AND CITE YOUR CLAIMS.
You sought to play word games with things like indistinguishable/indistinguishable antigenically when in this context it means the same thing and then on the margin they(authors of SMM) can outright claim that it's only HARD to distinguish(so is it hard or indistinguishable antigenically), so exactly how did they distinguish? They didn't they just inferred, and what was it inferred from or how, WHO KNOWS!? You also dismissed or didn't address the incredible discrepancy of 3-40% which screams more bogus bullshit and continued with your paradigm of "Cowpox inoculation against smallpox" because assertions are facts when in fact it only takes common sense to see that cowpox inoculation doesn't WORK from your own SOURCE, to which you say "so what it works for 90% or whatever arbitrary number you want to use" as I pointed out that there is no way to test for immunity caught through cowpox to smallpox when smallpox still becomes epidemic after vaccination/inoculation with cowpox and sought to assert that statistics show it works by not offering statistics or any sources and no knowledge on the methodology of testing these statistics, just more inference from assumptions as you failed to provide exactly how much of the population was inoculated, the most important thing.
Epic Can't try you for shit, your opinion matters because what you think of me has any bearing on you providing information/sources for your claims.