I do look forward to your future posts on this subject. I know how the system works (and doesn't work) here in the U.S. but know little of how it is approached in other countries. Only a short while here with @familyprotection has brought to light that the problem is world wide and an issue that needs addressing.
But the Child Protection System has lost it's way and at this point is corrupted to the point that I'm not even sure it can be saved.
It may not be that CPS has lost it's way but more like it has been directed in such a way that as you say "I'm not sure it can be saved.
A steemian posted a few days ago about how child protection used to operate in the beginning. It appears it was more conducted through private charities within communities rather than funded through the government. Many do not relate marketing tactics to social service agencies, but there is certainly a lot of it that takes place within the higher level of government that oversees these programs.
I recently posted on the Buchanan Bill that has been signed into law here in the states. It changes the focus for CPS from removing children to better serving the families and leaving the children in the home. It is a good first step, however, until it is made public few will realize this is something that needs to be challenged when CPS knocks at the door. Big changes take considerable time to reach the network of agencies and then training time for all staff to become accustomed to the changes. It does however give us a window of opportunity. Sad that mainstream media is not focused on reality these days and most likely will not be sharing the information with the general public.
Steem on my friend, it is a battle of good vs. evil. Am following you so as to hopefully not miss your upcoming information. Thank you for taking this on.
I haven't run across or heard of the Buchanan Bill, although that is great news. I'm adding it to my list of topics to dig into!
If it's a refocus on families, it would be a roll-back to pre-1974 policies since it was after legislation in the mid-70s that the official CPS focus became "the child" instead of "the family". You'd think it wouldn't be a big deal for Child Protective Services to focus singly on the child, but the legislation was apparently influenced by the whole philosophy I highlighted in the Richard Gelles quote: that families and children are not essentially linked and biology is not what investigators should be trying to accommodate when considering child removal.
This whole thing is so much part of the broader picture wherein we're all being cut loose from the ties that anchor and strengthen us: our families, our marriages, even our gender now. The mental and physical anguish this loosey-goosey treatment of essential biological truths such as children are generally best raised by their blood parents is playing havoc with our entire society.
Here is more info from a post I made a few weeks go. There is a link directly to the bill on there. @richq11 was looking into it more. Only 2 big concerns with it at this point. It does dish out additional funding to expedite adoptions which is a bit worrisome. The other concern I have is that something good seems to take a while for those effected to catch up. The gov. really should make a point to send announcement asap to all CPS agencies and family courts. https://steemit.com/fullyinformedpublic/@vickiebarker/u-s-president-signs-buchanan-bill-aimed-at-keeping-families-together
Thanks and will read up! @richq11 has been working on this whole information quest for the past few months, I notice, which is what initially sparked me to start reading history. I realized how little of it I knew!
Expediting adoptions...yes, that's a two-edged sword. On one hand, if a child really was taken from an awful place, getting him or her placed permanently as soon as possible takes away the limbo situation so many foster kids are caught in. But it also means that innocent parents are more likely than ever to lose their kids because the process happens so fast they don't have time to respond or stop it.
Another thing going for us is the intent of the bill is readily available. Not only throughout the bill but in the press release so it can be used if/when challenged. Yes, @richq11 is very helpful in so many areas. Well, there are many good people here on this platform, I am continually impressed.
I do also have to say...as one of Sander Levin's constituents, I get suspicious that he's involved in the Buchanan Bill. Sander is not...exactly...someone I highly trust with family freedom and individual rights.
Well that is curious too. @richq11 raised suspicion that Carl Levin is involved and although he is no longer there, I think Sander is his brother? This is certainly a law to watch and see how they roll it out. We must persevere in our diligence at this point, we have little choice otherwise. The world is turned upside down and Agenda 21/2030 is still moving ahead at every turn.