you make my brain hurt with your bullshit. you must be trying so hard to twist shit around red harring and strawman. it is insane.
If there are exceptions, the rule is negated and a new rule (usually the old one amended) is needed. Often it ends as a statistical rule, like that "in 99% (or simply most) cases ..."
"Often it ends as a statistical rule, like that "in 99% (or simply most) cases" so the exception to the rule does not negate the rule like I was saying. I fucking swear
Folk adages is not science, dude.
adages is a synonym for truth. where you came with "folk" I don't know.
so let me repeat what I said but use a word you wont try to twist around.
"The main principle of the "truth" is seen best when there is only one or a very few exceptions."
better?
No responsible scientist would say hey, these are exceptions but exceptions don't negate gravity'
really? you saying that with some exceptions to the rule that No responsible scientist would say "these are exceptions and don't negate gravity."?
it is a theory their will always be exceptions till everything is figured out then it becomes fact.
the exception to the rule negates the rule or it doesn't?
you attempt to dismiss CAIS example.
I did not dismiss it, I answered your questions. they genetically have to be males to have it. they are still male. that is why they have x and y even if y doesn't work. it does not change anything. it does not mean that we start saying humans have xx, xy or xx and xy, xy with a non working y, xxxx, xxy, xxxy or xy/xxy mosaic, ect on and on. the % of those cases are not the norm, they do not kill the rule, they add to it. just like you were saying about gravity.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/abnormal/abnormal_5.htm
if only male and female has exceptions you also have to recognize that other exceptions may exist.
I do recognize they exist, im saying just because it happens 0.00032% of the time does not make it the rule, it is an exception.
your bullshit is giving me a headache, you keep answering to replys that I cant respond to so I have to scroll up 4 days back to respond. steemit needs to fix this comment 6 deep shit.
So where these exceptions would start/end?
that is a good question. i do not have an answer to that one. each person has their own level of bullshit. some people see something that happens 0.0000032% of the time and try to act like it is the norm, some people accept it is a small exception and move on. especially when it comes to crap like this.
So, male or female?
i said they genetically have to be male to get it. you can not be a female and get it so obviously they are male. the fact that the y stops working in the xy does not make them xx, it makes them xy with a broken y.
how these exceptions are not non-binary gender?
it is a genetic disorder, so it is binary. genetic = binary, not physical = non-binary. i am saying the people with the genetic anomoloy that affects their biology then they are something other then male or female, without that super rare case of having different cromosones its not another gender. its make believe non-binary crap.
ps. I wonder if you even bothered to read the links you supplied. Really.
yes i did, that is why i have been able to back up all my statements unlike you.
ps2. If you want to quote me, please use > at the line start, not backticks. It looks awful with backticks.
fuck off, ill quote you however i feel like it. i like the way it looks. xD i honestly didn't know about > or i would have been using it. could have been more polite about letting me know how to quote like that.
well im done with this one for a little. if you respond could you please respond to the post so i
don't have to find an old post from days ago to respond to? have a good day and im sure ill hear back from you soon. xD
It forces the rule to be modified, so it technically negates it. Dude, read some Popper at the very least, you really excel at making fool of yourself.
A statistical rule is not an absolute rule with exceptions, it's a statistical rule. It may say that there are 90%, 60% or 40% having some X.
RLY? That what would make them male doesn't work to the extent that one can have sex with such a person and it does not change anything? Dude, your denial of reality is astounding.
Exactly, you do not have. Because there's no good answer to that one. Except to accept reality that sometimes (and that's way more than 0.0032%) genes, phenotype, behavior and identification are not in agreement. Which some people refuse because of their ideology.
Hm, wouldn't it mean that, following your logic a man who has sex with a CAIS person automatically becomes gay or at least bisexual? That would be funny!