That's nonsens. I eat meat because i am convinced that it i absolutely necessary to stay healthy as a human. Meat keeps you young. If you eat no meat and eggs you will ultimately suffer from rheumatism, heart disease, cancer, old skin etc.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
LOL, what kind of joke is that. The vegetarian diet is self-sifficient in nutrients and vegetarians do not suffer from heart diseases, cancer, old skin etc. more than the non vegetarians. In fact non vegetarians are often found to be fat and prone to many diseases, in comparison to vegetarians. My whole family is vegetarian from past many generations. Nobody is weak in our family or with any other bone or skin related diseases. The only advantage meat diet gives you is quick proteins and some other nutrients. And these are available in vegetarian diet also, but in a little less amounts. In the end, whichever diet you chose, you gonna die. It's all about the decisions we make. We can either be more sympathetic to these lower forms of life or we can just eat them. Choice is always ours.
Twaddle, pablum, and drivel, I have rarely witnessed such ignorance. Industrial meat and grain production are the main dangers of meat consumption and the consumption of grains, by the animals eaten. If you think that veges are free of disease, then you don't know the anemic wastrels that I have.
A vegetarian diet is not remotely SUFFICIENT in nutrients necessary to STAY healthy, long term.
Just a myth that a vegetarian diet is not remotely sufficient in nutrients! Come visit Gujrat in India, where most families are pure vegetarians. And then make make your decision. And I never said that vegetarians are free of diseases. But if you are taking a balanced vegetarian diet, then you are less likely to get diseases.
It is a myth that it is a myth, and once you dig into the biochemistry of it this becomes more than clear. If you should choose to not do the research, then by all means, I encourage you to remain a vegan for the rest of your life, such as it will be.
Ha, I don't research to prove a thing which generations of our people have already proved. Probably you yourself run a meat business of some scale, that's why you are advocating for it so much. If meat was that mandatory for our bodies, then we could survive only on meat. Try taking a meat only diet for 1 month, and then ask your body, how does it feel!
Unfounded accusations do not constitute an argument. It only further demonstrates that you have none, even while you admit you won't do the actual research, because 'everybody knows' appeal to popularity. What generations of our people have already proved is that they could give birth to, and raise the most unhealthy generation known to history, even though we are well fed.
We need a proper balance to be able to live healthily. Humans are not obligate carnivores. If I ate a solely meat diet i would expect to show a lack of clotting, lack of mucus production in the necessary places, dry eyes, impaired ability to tear and intestinal dysbiosis. This 'meat only diet' non-argument is a clear straw man used to take my argument to an extreme that I never did, to destroy an argument I never made.
That is what you are accusing. That vegetarians have risk of this and that. I just want to tell you that vegetarian diet is complete in it's nutrients. Meat is only a complimentary food and not mandatory. But vegetables and other vegetarian stuff is mandatory, you can't live without them. Meat becomes mandatory only when you live at places where vegetation is less and of less diversity. If someone lives in a village with farms or cities with supermarkets, then they do not need to eat meat for health or survival. This is just their choice. I am not saying that you eat meat or not, I don't care about that. But don't make untrue claims that meat is a necessity, unless you are referring to people living in desserts or other barren lands. End of the story.